Cited by 134Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and Conservation

A Comparison of Social Organization in Asian Elephants and African Savannah Elephants

de Silva, Shermin, Wittemyer, George·2012·International Journal of Primatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10764-011-9564-1

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Silva, S., & Wittemyer, G.
Affiliations
Save the Elephants (KE)
Venue
International Journal of Primatology
Published
2012-01-27
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1125-1141
ISSN
  • 0164-0291 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8604
OpenAlex
W2086587650
Cited by
134
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Asian elephant, African savannah elephant, social organization, social networks, social connectedness, group size, core groups, phylogenetic comparison, socioecology, Samburu

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review