The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: A review
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the fabrication methods of orthopedic implants and devices have been greatly developed. Additive manufacturing technology allows the production of complex structures with bio-mimicry features, and has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional fabrication methods. This review explores open-cellular structural design for porous metal implant applications, in relation to the mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Several types of additive manufacturing techniques including selective laser sintering, selective laser melting, and electron beam melting, are discussed for different applications. Additive manufacturing through powder bed fusion shows great potential for the fabrication of high-quality porous metal implants. However, the powder bed fusion technique still faces two major challenges: it is high cost and time-consuming. In addition, triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures are also analyzed in this paper, targeting the design of metal implants with an enhanced biomorphic environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular solids structure and properties
Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., et al. (1997) · Cited by 9,172
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals
Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2014-0009 · Cited by 6,402
Cellular solids: Structure and properties
Wolcott, M. P. (1990) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/0921-5093(90)90295-e · Cited by 5,926
Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering
O'Brien, F. J. (2011) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70058-x · Cited by 3,437
A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering
Melchels, F. P. W., Feijen, J., & Grijpma, D. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 · Cited by 2,457
Zheng, Y. F., Gu, X. N., & Witte, F. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 · Cited by 2,436
Chen, Q., & Thouas, G. A. (2015) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 · Cited by 2,398
Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds
Bose, S., Roy, M., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2012) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 · Cited by 2,206
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges
Maconachie, T., Leary, M., Lozanovski, B., Zhang, X., Qian, M., Faruque, O., & Brandt, M. (2019) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 · Cited by 1,497
Beautiful and Functional: A Review of Biomimetic Design in Additive Manufacturing
du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Yadroitsava, I., Yadroitsev, I., Hands, C. H., Kunju, R., & Bhate, D. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.033 · Cited by 448
Azarniya, A., Colera, X. G., Mirzaali, M. J., Sovizi, S., Bartolomeu, F., St Weglowski, M., Wits, W. W., Yap, C. Y., Ahn, J., Miranda, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.255 · Cited by 361
Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Function of Multi‐Material Hierarchically Structured Scaffolds
Koushik, T. M., Miller, C. M., & Antunes, E. (2023) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202202766 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, L., Ding, S., & Wen, C.
- Venue
- Bioactive Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-70
- ISSN
- 2097-1192 (ISSN-L)
- 2452-199X
- OpenAlex
- W2906529300
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 24.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003
- The paper
- Yuan, L., Ding, S., & Wen, C. (2019). Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: A review. Bioactive Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
