The DOI matches its Crossref record; 259 of the 259 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants
Open accessAbstract
Metals and alloys, including stainless steel, titanium and its alloys, cobalt alloys, and other metals and alloys have been widely used clinically as implant materials, but implant-related infection or inflammation is still one of the main causes of implantation failure. The bacterial infection or inflammation that seriously threatens human health has already become a worldwide complaint. Antibacterial metals and alloys recently have attracted wide attention for their long-term stable antibacterial ability, good mechanical properties and good biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. In this review, common antibacterial alloying elements, antibacterial standards and testing methods were introduced. Recent developments in the design and manufacturing of antibacterial metal alloys containing various antibacterial agents were described in detail, including antibacterial stainless steel, antibacterial titanium alloy, antibacterial zinc and alloy, antibacterial magnesium and alloy, antibacterial cobalt alloy, and other antibacterial metals and alloys. Researches on the antibacterial properties, mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of antibacterial metals and alloys have been summarized in detail for the first time. It is hoped that this review could help researchers understand the development of antibacterial alloys in a timely manner, thereby could promote the development of antibacterial metal alloys and the clinical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review
Staiger, M. P., Pietak, A. M., Huadmai, J., & Dias, G. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 · Cited by 4,452
Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications
Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J., & Turner, R. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3028 · Cited by 2,746
Silver as Antibacterial Agent: Ion, Nanoparticle, and Metal
Chernousova, S., & Epple, M. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201205923 · Cited by 2,264
Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., & Woodward, J. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382445a0 · Cited by 1,834
Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles
Qi, L., Xu, Z., Jiang, X., Hu, C., & Zou, X. (2004) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/j.carres.2004.09.007 · Cited by 1,804
Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface
Grass, G., Rensing, C., & Solioz, M. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02766-10 · Cited by 1,640
Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria
Zhang, Y.-M., & Rock, C. O. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1839 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 1×
“Some metal ions produced ROS by Fenton reactions, and other metal ion bond protein sulfhydryl group on bacterial membrane, which can maintain the integrity of bacterial DNA and cause the destruction of bacterial membrane, so as to achieve the effect of antibacterial effect [443,444].”
BackgroundIn vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys
Witte, F., Fischer, J., Nellesen, J., Crostack, H.-A., Kaese, V., Pisch, A., Beckmann, F., & Windhagen, H. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037 · Cited by 1,386
A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces
Campoccia, D., Montanaro, L., & Arciola, C. R. (2013) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.089 · Cited by 1,358
In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys
Gu, X., Zheng, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhong, S., & Xi, T. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.021 · Cited by 1,343
Cited by
Surface Design for Antibacterial Materials: From Fundamentals to Advanced Strategies
Li, W., Thian, E. S., Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Ren, L. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202100368 · Cited by 429
Wang, X., Shi, Q., Zha, Z., Zhu, D., Zheng, L., Shi, L., Wei, X., Lian, L., Wu, K., & Cheng, L. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.024 · Cited by 353
Fit and forget: The future of dental implant therapy via nanotechnology
Gulati, K., Chopra, D., Kocak-Oztug, N. A., & Verron, E. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.114900 · Cited by 89
Ferro-catalysis Bioelectronics: Progress and Prospects
Tang, X., Liu, Y., Li, L., Song, Y., Dai, Y., Yang, Y., Yuan, G., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109059 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, E., Zhao, X., Hu, J., Wang, R., Fu, S., & Qin, G.
- Venue
- Bioactive Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2569-2612
- ISSN
- 2097-1192 (ISSN-L)
- 2452-199X
- OpenAlex
- W3130093983
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 259
- FWCI
- 29.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.030
- The paper
- Zhang, E., Zhao, X., Hu, J., Wang, R., Fu, S., & Qin, G. (2021). Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants. Bioactive Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
