Cited by 1,640Antimicrobial agents and applicationsInfection Control in HealthcareNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface

Open access
Grass, Gregor, Rensing, Christopher, Solioz, Marc·2011·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Bacteria, yeasts, and viruses are rapidly killed on metallic copper surfaces, and the term "contact killing" has been coined for this process. While the phenomenon was already known in ancient times, it is currently receiving renewed attention. This is due to the potential use of copper as an antibacterial material in health care settings. Contact killing was observed to take place at a rate of at least 7 to 8 logs per hour, and no live microorganisms were generally recovered from copper surfaces after prolonged incubation. The antimicrobial activity of copper and copper alloys is now well established, and copper has recently been registered at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as the first solid antimicrobial material. In several clinical studies, copper has been evaluated for use on touch surfaces, such as door handles, bathroom fixtures, or bed rails, in attempts to curb nosocomial infections. In connection to these new applications of copper, it is important to understand the mechanism of contact killing since it may bear on central issues, such as the possibility of the emergence and spread of resistant organisms, cleaning procedures, and questions of material and object engineering. Recent work has shed light on mechanistic aspects of contact killing. These findings will be reviewed here and juxtaposed with the toxicity mechanisms of ionic copper. The merit of copper as a hygienic material in hospitals and related settings will also be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02766-10

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Copper exhibits a wide range of antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi and viruses.

    “Copper also exhibits a wide range of antimicrobial activity, including that against Gram-positive (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium difficile and Listeria monocytogenes) and Gram-negative (e.g., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria, fungi (Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis) and viruses (adenovirus, norovirus and Pol”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. Solioz, M., S. Mancini, H. K. Abicht, and M. Mermod. The lactic acid bacteria response to metal stress. In K. Papadimitriou and E. Tsakalidou (ed.), Stress response of lactic acid bacteria, in press. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grass, G., Rensing, C., & Solioz, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Solioz, Marc
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2011-03
Volume
77
Issue
5
Pages
1541-1547
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2103629556
Cited by
1,640
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 168 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • International Copper Association
  • University of South Africa
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 079192, R01GM079192)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR017675)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
copper, contact killing, antimicrobial surfaces, copper alloys, nosocomial infections, hospital hygiene, bacterial inactivation, surface disinfection
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Bacteria, Copper, Cross Infection, Disinfection, Equipment and Supplies, Fungi, United States, Viruses, Infection Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review