Cited by 18DNA Repair MechanismsBRCA gene mutations in cancerGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

BRCA1 is required for hMLH1 stabilization following doxorubicin-induced DNA damage

Romeo, Francesco, Falbo, Lucia, Di Sanzo, Maddalena, Misaggi, Roberta, Faniello, Maria C., Viglietto, Giuseppe, Cuda, Giovanni, Costanzo, Francesco +1 more·2011·The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology

Abstract

Human DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is involved in the removal of DNA base mismatches that arise either during DNA replication or are caused by DNA damage. In this study, we show that the activation of the MMR component hMLH1 in response to doxorubicin (DOX) treatment requires the presence of BRCA1 and that this phenomenon is mediated by an ATM/ATR dependent phosphorylation of the hMLH1 Ser-406 residue. BRCA1 is an oncosuppressor protein with a central role in the DNA damage response and it is a critical component of the ATM/ATR mediated checkpoint signaling. Starting from a previous finding in which we demonstrated that hMLH1 is able to bind to BRCA1, in this study we asked whether BRCA1 might be the bridge for ATM/ATR dependent phosphorylation of the hMLH1 molecular partner. We found that: (i) the negative modulation of BRCA1 expression is able to produce a remarkable reversal of hMLH1 stabilization, (ii) BRCA1 is required for post-translational modification produced by DOX treatment on hMLH1 which is, in turn, attributed to the ATM/ATR activity, (iii) the serine 406 phosphorylatable residue is critical for hMLH1 activation by ATM/ATR via BRCA1. Taken together, our data lend support to the hypothesis suggesting an important role of this oncosuppressor as a scaffold or bridging protein in DNA-damage response signaling via downstream phosphorylation of the ATM/ATR substrate hMLH1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.08.011

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romeo, F., Falbo, L., Di Sanzo, M., Misaggi, R., Faniello, M. C., Viglietto, G., Cuda, G., Costanzo, F., & Quaresima, B.
Affiliations
Magna Graecia University (IT)
Corresponding author
Costanzo, Francesco
Venue
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
1754-1763
ISSN
1357-2725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072547020
Cited by
18
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
BRCA1, MLH1, DNA mismatch repair, doxorubicin, DNA damage response, ATM/ATR signaling, protein phosphorylation, protein stabilization, oncosuppressor, checkpoint signaling
MeSH terms
MutL Protein Homolog 1, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, DNA, DNA Damage, Doxorubicin, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Serine, Signal Transduction, BRCA1 Protein, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review