Cited by 90Redox biology and oxidative stressAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

3-Nitrotyrosine quantification methods: Current concepts and future challenges

Open access
Teixeira, Dulce, Fernandes, Rúben, Prudêncio, Cristina, Vieira, Mónica·2016·Biochimie

Abstract

Background Measurement of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) in biological samples can be used as a biomarker of nitrosative stress, since it is very stable and suitable for analysis. Increased 3-NT levels in biological samples have been associated with several physiological and pathological conditions. Different methods have been described for the detection and quantification of this molecule, such as (i) immunological methods; (ii) liquid chromatography, namely high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based methods that use ultraviolet-visible (UV/VIS) absorption, electrochemical (ECD) and diode array (DAD) detection, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS); (iii) gas chromatography, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Methods A literature review on nitrosative stress, protein nitration, as well as 3-NT quantification methods was carried out. Results This review covers the different methods for analysis of 3-NT that have been developed during the last years as well as the latest advances in this field. Overall, all methods present positive and negative aspects, although it is clear that chromatography-based methods present good sensitivity and specificity. Regarding this, GC-based methods exhibit the highest sensibility in the quantification of 3-NT, although it requires a prior time consuming derivatization step. Conversely, HPLC does not require such derivatization step, despite being not as accurate as GC. Conclusion It becomes clear that all the methods described during this literature review, although accurate for 3-NT quantification, need to be improved regarding both sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, optimization of the protocols that have been described is clearly needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.02.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein carbonyls, 3-nitrotyrosine and methionine sulfoxide are biomarkers of protein oxidation commonly analyzed via immunochemical methods.

    “Protein carbonyls, 3-NT and methionine sulfoxide are biomarkers of protein oxidation which are commonly analyzed via immunochemical methods [75,82,92].”

    From Protein oxidation - Formation mechanisms, detection and relevance as biomarkers in human diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [92]

    Section 5, “Quantification of 3-nitrotyrosine in biological samples” (page not provided), says that a large part of 3-NT research has used antibody-based methods. The paper supports that part of the sentence, but the cited passages do not establish that protein carbonyls or methionine sulfoxide are commonly analyzed by immunochemical methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. D. Shah, N. Mahajan, S. Sah, S.K. Nath, B. Paudyal, Oxidative stress and its biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus, J. Biomed. Sci. 21 (2014), 23e23.
  2. R. Radi, Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 4003e4008.
  3. N. Sucu, A. Unlü, L. Tamer, B. Aytacoglu, B. Ercan, M. Dikmengil, U. Atik, 3- Nitrotyrosine in Atherosclerotic Blood Vessels, Clinical Chemistry and Labo- ratory Medicine: CCLM/FESCC, vol. 41, 2003, pp. 23e25.
  4. R.K. Upmacis, Atherosclerosis: A Link between Lipid Intake and Protein Tyrosine Nitration, Lipid Insights, vol. 2008, 2008, 75e75.
  5. P.G. Winyard, B. Ryan, P. Eggleton, A. Nissim, E. Taylor, M.L. Lo Faro, T. Burkholz, K.E. Szab o-Taylor, B. Fox, N. Viner, R.C. Haigh, N. Benjamin, A.M. Jones, M. Whiteman, Measurement and meaning of markers of reactive species of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur in healthy human subjects and patients with inflammatory joint disease, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39 (2011) 1226e1232.
  6. D.M.F. Mendonça, S.C.S. Martins, R. Higashi, M.N. Muscara, V.M. Neto, L. Chimelli, A.M.B. Martinez, Neurofilament Heavy Subunit in Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Biomarker of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis?, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, vol. 12, Official Publication Of The World Federation Of Neurology Research Group On Motor Neuron Diseases, 2011, pp. 144e147.
  7. Mahin D. Maines (Editor-In-Chief), [Et Al.], Chapter 17, (2012). 17.15-17.15.
  8. A.M. Fitzpatrick, L.A.S. Brown, F. Holguin, W.G. Teague, Levels of nitric oxide oxidation products are increased in the epithelial lining fluid of children with persistent asthma, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 124 (2009), 990e996.e991-999.
  9. R.L. Wixom, C.W. Gehrke, Chromatography: A Science of Discovery, Wiley, 2011.
  10. M. Naushad, M.R. Khan, Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry: Evaluation and Applications in Food Analysis, Taylor & Francis, 2014.
  11. V.R. Meyer, Practical High-performance Liquid Chromatography, Wiley, 2013.
  12. C. Herce-Pagliai, S. Kotecha, D.E. Shuker, Analytical methods for 3- nitrotyrosine as a marker of exposure to reactive nitrogen species: a review, Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. Off. J. Nitric Oxide Soc. 2 (1998) 324e336.
  13. M.W. Dong, Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists, Wiley, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira, D., Fernandes, R., Prudêncio, C., & Vieira, M.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigação em Saúde e Ambiente (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Vieira, Mónica
Venue
Biochimie
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
125
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0037-9042 (ISSN-L)
  • 0300-9084
OpenAlex
W2278824265
Cited by
90
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochimie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Integration into Scientific Research Grant
  • Centro de Investigação em Saúde e Ambiente (CISA) (B Int-ICD/IPP-BST/CISA/01/2014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
nitrotyrosine, nitrosative stress, protein nitration, immunological detection, HPLC detection, LC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Tyrosine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review