Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes

Slade, Eleanor M., Mann, Darren J., Lewis, Owen T.·2011·Biological Conservation
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Aarons, 2009, Dung pads increase pasture production, soil nutrients and microbial biomass carbon in grazed dairy systems, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 84, 81, 10.1007/s10705-008-9228-5 · DOI
  2. Amezquita, 2010, Removal rates of native and exotic dung by dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in a fragmented tropical rain forest, Environmental Entomology, 39, 328, 10.1603/EN09182 · doi:10.1603/en09182
  3. Andresen, 2001, Effects of dung presence, dung amount and secondary dispersal by dung beetles on the fate of Micropholis guyanensis (Sapotaceae) seeds in Central Amazonia, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 61, 10.1017/S0266467401001043 · DOI
  4. Andresen, 2002, Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers, Ecological Entomology, 27, 257, 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00408.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00408.x
  5. Andresen, 2003, Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration, Ecography, 26, 87, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03362.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Andresen, 2007, Possible indirect effects of mammal hunting on dung beetle assemblages in Panama, Biotropica, 39, 141, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00239.x · DOI
  7. Berry, 2010, The high value of logged tropical forests: lessons from northern Borneo, Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 985, 10.1007/s10531-010-9779-z · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boucomont, 1914, Les Coprophages de L’archepel Malais, Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 83, 238, 10.1080/21686351.1914.12279408 · doi:10.1080/21686351.1914.12279408
  9. Bowles, 1998, Logging and tropical forest conservation, Science, 280, 1899, 10.1126/science.280.5371.1899 · DOI
  10. Davis, 1996, Seasonal dung beetle activity and dung dispersal in selected South African habitats: implications for pasture improvement in Australia, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 58, 157, 10.1016/0167-8809(96)01030-4 · doi:10.1016/0167-8809(96)01030-4
  11. Davis, 2000, Does reduced-impact logging help preserve biodiversity in tropical rainforests? A case study from Borneo using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) as indicators, Environmental Entomology, 29, 467, 10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.467 · doi:10.1603/0046-225x-29.3.467
  12. Davis, 2005, Effect of deforestation on a Southwest Ghana dung beetle assemblage (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) at the periphery of Ankasa Conservation Area, Environmental Entomology, 34, 1081, 10.1093/ee/34.5.1081 · DOI
  13. Davis, 2009, Regional fragmentation of rain forest in West Africa and its effect on local dung beetle assemblage structure, Biotropica, 41, 215, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00472.x · DOI
  14. Davis, 2000, The role of local and regional processes in shaping dung beetle communities in tropical forest plantations in Borneo, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9, 281, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00189.x · DOI
  15. Davis, 2001, Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern Borneo, Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 593, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00619.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Doube, 1990, A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages, Ecological Entomology, 15, 371, 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1990.tb00820.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dunn, 2004, Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration, Conservation Biology, 18, 302, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00151.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Escobar, 2004, Diversity and composition of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages in a heterogeneous Andean landscape, Tropical Zoology, 17, 123, 10.1080/03946975.2004.10531202 · DOI
  19. Feer, 2005, Diel flight activity and ecological segregation within an assemblage of tropical forest dung and carrion beetles, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 1, 10.1017/S0266467404002056 · doi:10.1017/s0266467404002056
  20. Finn, 2001, Ephemeral resource patches as model systems for diversity-function experiments, Oikos, 92, 363, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920219.x · DOI
  21. Gardner, 2007, Predicting the uncertain future of tropical forest species in a data vacuum, Biotropica, 39, 25, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00228.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Gardner, 2008, Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for Neotropical dung beetles, Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 883, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01454.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Halffter, 1993, The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analysing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes, Biology International, 27, 15
  24. Hamer, 2005, Temporal variation in abundance and diversity of butterflies in Bornean rain forests: opposite impacts of logging recorded in different seasons, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 417, 10.1017/S0266467405002361 · doi:10.1017/s0266467405002361
  25. Hammer, 2001, PAST: palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis, Palaeontologica Electronica, 4, 9
  26. Hanski, 1983, Distributional ecology and abundance of dung and carrion feeding beetles Scarabaeidae in tropical rain forests in Sarawak Borneo Malaysia, Acta Zoologica Fennica, 167, 1
  27. Horgan, 2005, Effects of deforestation on diversity, biomass and function of dung beetles on the eastern slopes of the Peruvian Andes, Forest Ecology and Management, 216, 117, 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.049 · DOI
  28. Johns, 1996, Bird population persistence in Sabahan logging concessions, Biological Conservation, 75, 3, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00044-5 · DOI
  29. Klein, 1989, Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia, Ecology, 70, 171, 10.2307/1938106 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lambert, 1992, The consequences of selective logging for Bornean Lowland forest birds, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 335, 443, 10.1098/rstb.1992.0036 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Larsen, 2005, Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies, Biotropica, 37, 322, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00042.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lee, 2009, Changes in dung beetle communities along a gradient of tropical forest disturbance in South-East Asia, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25, 677, 10.1017/S0266467409990174 · DOI
  33. Lemmon, 1957, A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density, Journal of Forestry, 55, 667
  34. Lewis, 2001, Effects of experimental selective logging on tropical butterflies, Conservation Biology, 15, 389, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002389.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002389.x
  35. Lewis, 2009, Biodiversity change and ecosystem function in tropical forests, Basic and Applied Ecology, 10, 97, 10.1016/j.baae.2008.08.010 · DOI
  36. Louzada, 2010, Community structure of dung beetles in Amazonian savannas: role of fire disturbance, vegetation and landscape structure, Landscape Ecology, 25, 631, 10.1007/s10980-010-9448-3 · DOI
  37. Marsh, 1992, Forest land-use in Sabah, Malaysia – an introduction to Danum Valley, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 335, 331, 10.1098/rstb.1992.0025 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Meijaard, 2007, A logged forest in Borneo is better than none at all, Nature, 446, 974, 10.1038/446974a · DOI
  39. Meijaard, 2006, Wildlife conservation in Bornean timber concessions, Ecology and Society, 11, 47, 10.5751/ES-01715-110147 · DOI
  40. Nichols, 2007, Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis, Biological Conservation, 137, 1, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Nichols, 2008, Ecological functions and ecosystem services of Scarabaeine dung beetles: a review, Biological Conservation, 141, 1461, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Nichols, 2009, Co-declining mammals and dung beetles: an impending ecological cascade, Oikos, 118, 481, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17268.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17268.x · Paper page
  43. Ochi, 1996, Studies on the family Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) from Borneo. I. Identification key to subfamilies, tribes and genera, Giomale Italia Entomologia, 8, 37
  44. Pinard, 1996, Retaining forest biomass by reducing logging damage, Biotropica, 28, 278, 10.2307/2389193 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Putz, 2001, Tropical forest management and conservation of biodiversity: an overview, Conservation Biology, 15, 7, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00018.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Quintero, 2005, Rapid recovery of dung beetle communities following habitat fragmentation in central Amazonia, Ecology, 86, 3303, 10.1890/04-1960 · DOI
  47. Scheffler, 2005, Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21, 9, 10.1017/S0266467404001683 · DOI
  48. Shahabuddin, 2005, Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi (Indonesia), Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 863, 10.1007/s10531-004-0654-7 · doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0654-7
  49. Shahabuddin, 2010, Diversity and body size of dung beetles attracted to different dung types along a tropical land-use gradient in Sulawesi, Indonesia, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 26, 53, 10.1017/S0266467409990423 · DOI
  50. Slade, 2007, Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest, Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 1094, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01296.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. Smith, 2003, Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss, Ecology Letters, 6, 509, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. Spector, 2006, Scarabaeine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation, Coleopterists Bulletin, 5, 71, 10.1649/0010-065X(2006)60[71:SDBCSS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Struhsaker, 1998, A biologist’s perspective on the role of sustainable harvest in conservation, Conservation Biology, 12, 930, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97283.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97283.x
  54. Vulinec, 2002, Dung beetle communities and seed dispersal in primary forest and disturbed land in Amazonia, Biotropica, 34, 297, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00541.x · DOI
  55. Whitmore, 1999, Arguments on the forest frontier, Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 865, 10.1023/A:1008836306030 · doi:10.1023/a:1008836306030
  56. Willott, 2000, Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest, Conservation Biology, 14, 1055, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98427.x · DOI
  57. Wright, 2005, Tropical forests in a changing environment, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 553, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Wright, 2006, The future of tropical forest species, Biotropica, 38, 287, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Slade, E. M., Mann, D. J., & Lewis, O. T.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
166-174
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011
OpenAlex
W2039685510
Cited by
207
References
2
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • NERC-CASE
  • Royal Society University Research Fellowship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011
The paper
Slade, E. M., Mann, D. J., & Lewis, O. T. (2011). Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.