The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California
Open accessAbstract
Human-driven declines of apex predators can trigger widespread impacts throughout ecological communities. Reduced apex predator occupancy or activity can release mesopredators from intraguild competition, with unknown repercussions on the ecological community. As exurban development continues to expand worldwide, it is important to document how mesopredators are impacted by the combined influences of apex predators and humans. We used motion-detecting camera traps to examine spatial and temporal patterns of meso- and apex predator occupancy and activity in a fragmented landscape in California. We hypothesized that both spatial and temporal partitioning among the carnivore guild would be affected by varied levels of human influence. We found that higher residential development reduced puma occupancy but was not related to the occupancy of mesopredators. Bobcats, grey foxes, and Virginia opossums were detected more often at sites occupied by pumas, whereas coyotes and raccoons were detected less often. The detection probabilities of smaller mesopredators were related to coyotes, a dominant mesopredator, but the magnitude and direction of these correlations differed depending upon puma occupancy. We also found that species altered their activities temporally in locations with higher human use, with pumas, bobcats and coyotes reducing diurnal activities and increasing nocturnal ones. These activity shifts were reflected in reduced temporal partitioning between intraguild competitors, with unknown effects on species interactions and repercussions to the prey community. Our results suggest that human development and activity alters predator community structure through both direct and indirect pathways. Therefore effective carnivore conservation requires an understanding of how mesopredators respond to varying levels of apex predator and anthropogenic influences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., Carpenter, S. R., Essington, T. E., Holt, R. D., Jackson, J. B. C., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205106 · Cited by 4,087 · cited 1×
“Anthropogenic-driven extirpation of apex predators from ecosystems across the globe has had led to large changes in community structure and dynamics in diverse ecosystems (Estes et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation
Crooks, K. R. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x · Cited by 943
Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivores
Fedriani, J. M., Fuller, T. K., Sauvajot, R. M., & York, E. C. (2000) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000448 · Cited by 463
Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland
Selva, N., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., & Wajrak, A. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-158 · Cited by 343
Johnson, C. N., Isaac, J. L., & Fisher, D. O. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3711 · Cited by 325 · cited 2×
“…of apex predators and release of mesopredators has been identified as a possible cause for the decline or extinction of songbirds and small mammals, because they are disproportionately preyed upon by mesopredators (Crooks and Soulé, 1999; Johnson et al., 2007; Ritchie and Johnson, 2009).”
BackgroundWolves–coyotes–foxes: a cascade among carnivores
Levi, T., & Wilmers, C. C. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-0165.1 · Cited by 293
Self-citationGray Wolves as Climate Change Buffers in Yellowstone
Wilmers, C. C., & Getz, W. M. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030092 · Cited by 211 · cited 1×
“In addition, carrion provided by apex predators can serve as an important food source for smaller predators (Allen et al., 2015a; Ruth and Murphy, 2009; Selva et al., 2005; Wilmers and Getz, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Comparative Effects of Large Carnivores on the Acquisition of Carrion by Scavengers
Allen, M. L., Elbroch, L. M., Wilmers, C. C., & Wittmer, H. U. (2015) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/681004 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Cited by
Contrasting effects of human settlement on the interaction among sympatric apex carnivores
Penjor, U., Astaras, C., Cushman, S. A., Kaszta, Ż., & Macdonald, D. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2681 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Allen, M. L., & Wilmers, C. C.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 190
- Pages
- 23-33
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2195491890
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.007
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Allen, M. L., & Wilmers, C. C. (2015). Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.