The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ) have a near-global distribution. They range from being feral and free-ranging to owned and completely dependent on humans. All types of domestic dogs can interact with wildlife and have severe negative impacts on biodiversity. Here, we use IUCN Red List data to quantify the number of threatened species negatively impacted by dogs, assess the prevalence of different types of dog impact, and identify regional hotspots containing high numbers of impacted species. Using this information, we highlight key research and management gaps and priorities. Domestic dogs have contributed to 11 vertebrate extinctions and are a known or potential threat to at least 188 threatened species worldwide. These estimates are greater than those reported by previous assessments, but are probably conservative due to biases in the species, regions and types of impacts studied and/or reported. Predation is the most frequently reported impact, followed by disturbance, disease transmission, competition, and hybridisation. Regions with the most species impacted are: South-east Asia, Central America and the Caribbean, South America, Asia (excluding SE), Micro/Mela/Polynesia, and Australia. We propose that the impacts of domestic dogs can be better understood and managed through: taxonomic and spatial prioritisation of research and management; examining potential synergisms between dogs and other threatening processes; strategic engagement with animal welfare and human health campaigns; community engagement and education; and mitigating anthropogenic effects such as resource subsidies. Such actions are essential for threatened species persistence, especially given that human and dog populations are expected to increase both numerically and geographically in the coming decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
Latitudinal Gradients of Biodiversity: Pattern, Process, Scale, and Synthesis
Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M., & Stevens, R. D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032 · Cited by 2,163
Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss
Doherty, T. S., Glen, A. S., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., & Dickman, C. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602480113 · Cited by 1,270
Self-citationA global strategy for road building
Laurance, W. F., Clements, G. R., Sloan, S., O’Connell, C. S., Mueller, N. D., Goosem, M., Venter, O., Edwards, D. P., Phalan, B., Balmford, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13717 · Cited by 911
A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife
Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005 · Cited by 671
A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates
Medina, F. M., Bonnaud, E., Vidal, E., Tershy, B. R., Zavaleta, E. S., Josh Donlan, C., Keitt, B. S., Corre, M., Horwath, S. V., & Nogales, M. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02464.x · Cited by 662
Severity of the Effects of Invasive Rats on Seabirds: A Global Review
JONES, H. P., TERSHY, B. R., ZAVALETA, E. S., CROLL, D. A., KEITT, B. S., FINKELSTEIN, M. E., & HOWALD, G. R. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00859.x · Cited by 559
Fund, U. N. P. (2015) · State of World Population · doi:10.18356/b793d926-en · Cited by 550
Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs
Frantz, L. A. F., Mullin, V. E., Pionnier-Capitan, M., Lebrasseur, O., Ollivier, M., Perri, A., Linderholm, A., Mattiangeli, V., Teasdale, M. D., Dimopoulos, E. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf3161 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Effects on carrion consumption in a mammalian scavenger community when dominant species are excluded
Tobajas, J., Descalzo, E., Ferreras, P., Mateo, R., & Margalida, A. (2021) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00163-w · Cited by 22
Lyons, M. A., Malhotra, R., & Thompson, C. W. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276880 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Doherty, T. S., Dickman, C. R., Glen, A. S., Newsome, T. M., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., Vanak, A. T., & Wirsing, A. J.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 210
- Pages
- 56-59
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2608406754
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.007
- The paper
- Doherty, T. S., Dickman, C. R., Glen, A. S., Newsome, T. M., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., Vanak, A. T., & Wirsing, A. J. (2017). The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.