Threats to seabirds: A global assessment
Open accessAbstract
We present the first objective quantitative assessment of the threats to all 359 species of seabirds, identify the main challenges facing them, and outline priority actions for their conservation. We applied the standardised Threats Classification Scheme developed for the IUCN Red List to objectively assess threats to each species and analysed the data according to global IUCN threat status, taxonomic group, and primary foraging habitat (coastal or pelagic). The top three threats to seabirds in terms of number of species affected and average impact are: invasive alien species, affecting 165 species across all the most threatened groups; bycatch in fisheries, affecting fewer species (100) but with the greatest average impact; and climate change/severe weather, affecting 96 species. Overfishing, hunting/trapping and disturbance were also identified as major threats to seabirds. Reversing the top three threats alone would benefit two-thirds of all species and c. 380 million individual seabirds (c. 45% of the total global seabird population). Most seabirds (c. 70%), especially globally threatened species, face multiple threats. For albatrosses, petrels and penguins in particular (the three most threatened groups of seabirds), it is essential to tackle both terrestrial and marine threats to reverse declines. As the negative effects of climate change are harder to mitigate, it is vital to compensate by addressing other major threats that often affect the same species, such as invasive alien species, bycatch and overfishing, for which proven solutions exist.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds, with anthropogenic impacts resulting in population declines for the majority of species.
“Seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds, with anthropogenic impacts resulting in population declines for the majority of species (Croxall et al. 2012; Dias et al. 2019).”
From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Dias et al. 2019
The Introduction (p. 3) supports the statement that seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds and identifies threats driving declines. But it reports declining population trends for 47% of species—almost half, not the claimed majority. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743 · see citing works
Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains
Jones, H. P., Holmes, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Tershy, B. R., Kappes, P. J., Corkery, I., Aguirre-Muñoz, A., Armstrong, D. P., Bonnaud, E., Burbidge, A. A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521179113 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds
Carney, K. M., & Sydeman, W. J. (1999) · Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology · doi:10.2307/1521995 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success
Giese, M. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00060-7 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America
Stuntz, L., & Orben, R. A. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72118
“Seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds, with anthropogenic impacts resulting in population declines for the majority of species (Croxall et al. 2012; Dias et al. 2019).”
- Authors
- Dias, M. P., Martin, R., Pearmain, E. J., Burfield, I. J., Small, C., Phillips, R. A., Yates, O., Lascelles, B., Borboroglu, P. G., & Croxall, J. P.
- Affiliations
- BirdLife international (GB)
- Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB)
- British Antarctic Survey (GB)
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dias, Maria P.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 237
- Pages
- 525-537
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966203395
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 121 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 51.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics
- Baqai Medical University
- Cambridge Conservation Initiative
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- seabirds, invasive species, climate change impacts, overfishing, disturbance, albatrosses, petrels, penguins, seabird conservation, IUCN Red List, multiple threats, foraging habitat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review