CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife conservation

Manfredo, Michael J., Urquiza-Haas, Esmeralda G., Don Carlos, Andrew W., Bruskotter, Jeremy T., Dietsch, Alia M.·2020·Biological Conservation
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108297
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study proposes that anthropomorphism is a key factor in stimulating both wildlife value shift and changing attitudes toward wildlife management in modernized countries. Evidence suggests that cultural shift due to modernization increases anthropomorphic attributions which leads to seeing wildlife as more human-like. This provides a foundation for a shift in values from domination, in which wildlife are for human uses, to mutualism in which wildlife are seen as part of one’s social community. This theoretical proposition was tested with a nationwide study of 43,949 U.S. subjects obtained by mail survey and e-mail panel. Values and anthropomorphism were measured using established item scaling. We found that, as expected, anthropomorphism is strongly related to mutualist values. It was weakly associated with modernization variables (income, urbanization, education) at the individual level and moderately associated at the state level. Results suggest a modernized environment fosters anthropomorphic attribution, but the variables we used are not the proximate cause of this process at individual level. To provide a partial test of the likely causal sequence, we found that the effect of anthropomorphism on attitudes is mediated by wildlife values. Anthropomorphism, through its effect in stimulating value shift, leads to challenges of traditional approaches to wildlife management. It emphasizes consideration of individual animals and the avoidance of lethal control techniques su…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108297

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Bandura, 2007, Impeding ecological sustainability through selective moral disengagement, Int. J. Sustain. Develop., 2, 8
  2. Bastian, 2012, Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption, Personality Social Psychol. Bull., 38, 247, 10.1177/0146167211424291 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baumeister, 1995, The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, Psychol. Bull., 117, 497, 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bilewicz, 2011, The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores, Eur. J. Social Psychol., 41, 201, 10.1002/ejsp.766 · DOI
  5. Boster, 1989, Form or function: a comparison of expert and novice judgments of similarity among fish, Am. Anthropol., 91, 866, 10.1525/aa.1989.91.4.02a00040 · DOI
  6. Bruskotter, 2019, Conserevationist’s moral obligations toward wildlife: Values and identity promote conservation conflict, Biol. Conserv., 240, 108296, 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108296 · DOI
  7. Bruskotter, 2017, Modernization, risk, and conservation of the world’s largest carnivores, BioScience, 67, 646, 10.1093/biosci/bix049 · DOI
  8. Buccino, 2004, Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 114, 10.1162/089892904322755601 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chao, 1999, Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects, Nat. Neurosci., 2, 913, 10.1038/13217 · DOI
  10. Daly, 2006, An investigation of human-animal interactions and empathy as related to pet preference, ownership, attachment, and attitudes in children, Anthrozoös, 19, 113, 10.2752/089279306785593801 · DOI
  11. Descola, 2006, Beyond nature and culture, Proc. Br. Acad., 139, 137
  12. Eddy, 1993, Attribution of cognitive states to animals: anthropomorphism in comparative perspective, J. Soc. Issues, 49, 87, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x · DOI
  13. Fausto, 2007, Feasting on people: eating animals and humans in Amazonia, Curr. Anthropol., 48, 497, 10.1086/518298 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Filippi, 2010, The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans, PLoS One, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0010847 · DOI
  15. Filippi, 2013, The “vegetarian brain”: chatting with monkeys and pigs?, Brain Struct. Funct., 218, 1211, 10.1007/s00429-012-0455-9 · DOI
  16. Franklin, 2013, Neural responses to perceiving suffering in humans and animals, Soc. Neurosci., 8, 217, 10.1080/17470919.2013.763852 · DOI
  17. Goldstone, 1997, Similarity in context, Mem. Cognit., 25, 237, 10.3758/BF03201115 · DOI
  18. Goldstone, 2001, Altering object representations through category learning, Cognition, 78, 27, 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00099-8 · DOI
  19. Heeren, 2017, Expert judgment and uncertainty regarding the protection of imperilled species, Conserv. Biol., 31, 657, 10.1111/cobi.12838 · DOI
  20. Helander-Renvall, 2010, Animism, personhood and the nature of reality: sami perspectives, Polar Rec., 46, 44, 10.1017/S0032247409990040 · DOI
  21. Jacobson, 2008, Governance of state wildlife management: Reform and revive or resist and retrench?, Soc. Nat. Resour., 21, 441, 10.1080/08941920801898465 · DOI
  22. Jost, 2005, Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 14, 260, 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kaiser, 2012, Socially tuned: brain responses differentiating human and animal motion, Soc. Neurosci., 7, 301, 10.1080/17470919.2011.614003 · DOI
  24. Khalid, 2016, Relationship between pet attachment and empathy among young adults, J. Behav. Sci., 26, 66
  25. Manfredo, 2009, Linking society and environment: a multi-level model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western U.S, Soc. Sci. Q., 90, 407, 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00624.x · DOI
  26. Manfredo, 2017, Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation, Conserv. Biol., 31, 772, 10.1111/cobi.12855 · DOI
  27. Manfredo, 2016, Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation, Conserv. Biol., 30, 287, 10.1111/cobi.12619 · DOI
  28. Marcu, 2007, Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: post-materialist and materialist dehumanization, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 46, 875, 10.1348/014466607X174356 · DOI
  29. Martín-Fores, 2013, Anthropomorphic factors influencing Spanish conservation policies of vertebrates, Int. J. Biodivers., 2013, 19, 10.1155/2013/142670 · DOI
  30. Martín-López, 2007, The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation, Biol. Conserv., 139, 67, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.005 · DOI
  31. Mellor, 2008, Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction, Pers. Individ. Dif., 45, 213, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020 · DOI
  32. Okulicz- Kozaryn, 2016, Urbanism and happiness: a test of Wirth’s theory of urban life, Urban Stud., 55, 349, 10.1177/0042098016645470 · DOI
  33. Pattberg, 2007, Conquest, domination and control: Europe’s mastery of nature in historical perspective, J. Political Ecol., 14, 1
  34. Paul, 2000, Veterinary education and students’ attitudes towards animal welfare, Vet. Rec., 146, 269, 10.1136/vr.146.10.269 · DOI
  35. Ramp, 2015, Compassion as a practical and evolved ethic for conservation, BioScience, 65, 323, 10.1093/biosci/biu223 · DOI
  36. Rasmussen, 1993, Humans’ perceptions of animal mentality: ascriptions of thinking, J. Comp. Psychol., 107, 283, 10.1037/0735-7036.107.3.283 · DOI
  37. Rothgerber, 2014, Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoidance. The mediating role of empathy toward animals, Appetite, 79, 11, 10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.032 · DOI
  38. Tam, 2013, Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature, J. Experiment. Social Psychol., 49, 514, 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001 · DOI
  39. Teel, 2009, Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation, Conserv. Biol., 24, 128, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x · DOI
  40. Urquiza-Haas, 2015, The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species, Anim. Behav., 109, 167, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011 · DOI
  41. Verhagen, 2017, Unmet belongingness needs but not high belongingness needs alone predict adverse well‐being; a response surface modeling approach, J. Pers., 86, 498, 10.1111/jopy.12331 · DOI
  42. Viveiros de Castro, 1998, Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism, J. R. Anthropol. Inst., 4, 469, 10.2307/3034157 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Waytz, 2010, Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 5, 219, 10.1177/1745691610369336 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Westbury, 2008, Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances, Biol. Psychol., 78, 66, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.12.009 · DOI
  45. Wiedmann, 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, 6271, 10.1073/pnas.1220362110 · DOI
  46. Williams, 2010, Children and their pets: exploring the relationships between pet ownership, pet attitudes, attachment to pets and empathy, Educ. Health, 28, 12
  47. Würbel, 2009, Ethology applied to animal ethics, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 118, 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.019 · DOI
  48. Wynne, 2004, The perils of anthropomorphism, Nature, 428, 10.1038/428606a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 91

Metadata

Authors
Manfredo, M. J., Urquiza-Haas, E. G., Don Carlos, A. W., Bruskotter, J. T., & Dietsch, A. M.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
241
Pages
108297
ISSN
0006-3207
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108297
Cited by
91
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review