Cited by 303Anthropological Studies and InsightsAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

Feasting on People: Eating Animals and Humans in Amazonia

Fausto, Carlos·2007·Current Anthropology

Abstract

A problem of particular concern in the literature on animistic systems is the status of hunting and food consumption in societies whose ontology is not founded upon a distinction between humans and animals. If animals are people, how can one distinguish between everyday eating and cannibalism? Commensality is a vector for producing kinship among humans, a mechanism which depends on the transformation of the animal prey into an object devoid of intentionality. Indigenous techniques for desubjectivizing prey are based on a specific conception of the person that is not reducible to a simple body‐and‐soul dualism. A new theoretical formulation for this partibility sheds light on warfare and funerary anthropophagy in Amazonia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/518298

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent sources of information for cannibalistic behaviour in South America come from ethnographic evidence as well as direct observations by anthropologists.

    “More recent sources of information for cannibalistic behaviour in South America come from ethnographic evidence as well as direct observations by anthropologists (Fausto, 2007;Forsyth, 1983;Whitehead, 1984).”
  • It is common for groups that engage in funerary endocannibalism to also practice warfare-related exocannibalism, with both forms embedded in symbolic and ritual frameworks.

    “In fact, it is common for groups that engage in funerary endocannibalism to also practice warfare-related exocannibalism, with both forms embedded in symbolic and ritual frameworks12–14,64.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fausto, C.
Corresponding author
Fausto, Carlos
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2007-08
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
497-530
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W1483030609
Cited by
303
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 28
FWCI
68.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
animism, cannibalism, commensality, kinship, personhood, hunting, dietary intake, war, funerary practices, Amazon basin, body-soul dualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review