Production of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium pullulans as a potential mechanism of action against postharvest fruit pathogens
Abstract
Two Aureobasidium pullulans strains (L1 and L8), effective against some fruit postharvest pathogens were evaluated for VOCs production as a part of their modes of action towards five pathogens (Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum acutatum, Penicillium expansum, Penicilliumdigitatum and Penicilliumitalicum). The VOCs were assayed with a double petri dish assay against conidia germination of target pathogens. Results obtained showed that the VOCs generated by the antagonists inhibited significantly the conidia germination of all pathogens compared to the control. In particular, the conidia germination of all Penicillium was completely inhibited by VOCs produced by L1 and L8. In in vivo tests, apples and oranges were artificially inoculated with pathogen conidia and then biofumigated with VOCs emitted by both antagonists. The antagonistic treatment controlled significantly pathogen infection, confirming the results obtained in vitro tests. The best L1 and L8 VOCs activity was observed on apple inoculated with B. cinerea where the lesion diameter reduction observed was greater than the 88%. The compounds emitted by L1 and L8 strains were identified with the solid-phase microextraction (SPME)–gas chromatographic technique. Compounds as 2-phenyl, 1-butanol-3-methyl, 1-butanol-2-methyl and 1-propanol-2-methyl belonging to the group of alcohols were mainly produced for both strains, in the first 96h of growth. These compounds were confirmed by comparison with standards. The pure compounds of VOCs cited above were used to determine the EC50 values for conidia germination of pathogens. The 1-propanol-2-methyl was the VOC least active against all tested fungi, with the EC50 values over 0.8μlml−1, while the 2-phenethyl alcohol was the most active with EC50 values lower than 0.8μlml−1, except for the C. acutatum (1.97μlml−1). The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that the production of VOCs could play an essential role in the antagonistic activity of two A. pullulans strains against five fruit postharvest pathogens.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Volatiles produced by A. pullulans proved efficient in reducing the growth and infection by B. cinerea, C. acutatum, P. expansum, P. digitatum and P. italicum both in vitro and in planta.
“Volatiles produced by A. pullulans proved efficient in reducing the growth and infection by B. cinerea, C. acutatum, P. expansum, P. digitatum and P. italicum both in vitro and in planta (Di Francesco et al. 2014).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Di Francesco et al. 2014
Cites
Huang, R., Che, H. J., Zhang, J., Yang, L., Jiang, D. H., & Li, G. Q. (2012) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.02.010 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spadaro, D., & Droby, S. (2016) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications
Freimoser, F. M., Rueda-Mejia, M. P., Tilocca, B., & Migheli, Q. (2019) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-019-2728-4 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Oro, L., Feliziani, E., Ciani, M., Romanazzi, G., & Comitini, F. (2018) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.10.027 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Biofilm production by Aureobasidium pullulans improves biocontrol against sour rot in citrus
Klein, M. N., & Kupper, K. C. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2017.07.008 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Konsue, W., Dethoup, T., & Limtong, S. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8030317 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Choińska, R., Piasecka-Jóźwiak, K., Chabłowska, B., Dumka, J., & Łukaszewicz, A. (2020) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-020-01420-7 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Di Francesco, A., Ugolini, L., Lazzeri, L., & Mari, M.
- Affiliations
- Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mari, Marta
- Venue
- Biological Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 8-14
- ISSN
- 1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044765997
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Control (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- Aureobasidium pullulans, volatile organic compounds, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium, Colletotrichum acutatum, biofumigation, apple, orange, antagonistic activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review