The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops
Open accessAbstract
Crop pathogens and pests reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. They cause substantial economic losses and reduce food security at household, national and global levels. Quantitative, standardized information on crop losses is difficult to compile and compare across crops, agroecosystems and regions. Here, we report on an expert-based assessment of crop health, and provide numerical estimates of yield losses on an individual pathogen and pest basis for five major crops globally and in food security hotspots. Our results document losses associated with 137 pathogens and pests associated with wheat, rice, maize, potato and soybean worldwide. Our yield loss (range) estimates at a global level and per hotspot for wheat (21.5% (10.1-28.1%)), rice (30.0% (24.6-40.9%)), maize (22.5% (19.5-41.1%)), potato (17.2% (8.1-21.0%)) and soybean (21.4% (11.0-32.4%)) suggest that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations, and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases. Our assessment highlights differences in impacts among crop pathogens and pests and among food security hotspots. This analysis contributes critical information to prioritize crop health management to improve the sustainability of agroecosystems in delivering services to societies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many other GM traits developed in labs were rarely approved for commercial application, including traits for resistance to fungi and bacteria, tolerance to drought and heat, and improved nitrogen use efficiency.
“many other GM traits developed in labs were rarely approved for commercial application ( 21 ), including traits for resistance to fungi and bacteria, tolerance to drought and heat, and improved nitrogen use efficiency ( 22 ).”
From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., Andrews, K. G., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8 · Cited by 11,805 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Growing a circular economy with fungal biotechnology: a white paper
Meyer, V., Basenko, E. Y., Benz, J. P., Braus, G. H., Caddick, M. X., Csukai, M., de Vries, R. P., Endy, D., Frisvad, J. C., Gunde-Cimerman, N., et al. (2020) · Fungal Biology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z · Cited by 515 · see citing works
“However, even with the solutions available from the agricultural industry, crop losses remain high in soybean and a wide range of other crops [93].”
BackgroundEstimating resilience of crop production systems: From theory to practice
Zampieri, M., Weissteiner, C. J., Grizzetti, B., Toreti, A., van den Berg, M., & Dentener, F. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139378 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops
Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., M’Gonigle, L. K., Missirian, A., Qaim, M., Sargent, R. D., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9340 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Drakopoulos, D., Kägi, A., Six, J., Zorn, A., Wettstein, F. E., Bucheli, T. D., Forrer, H.-R., & Vogelgsang, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Kthiri, Z., Ben Jabeur, M., Karmous, C., & Hamada, W. (2025) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.1080/15592324.2025.2596486
- Authors
- Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., & Nelson, A.
- Affiliations
- Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (FR)
- Cornell University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Twente (NL)
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2019-02-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 430-439
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913500366
- Cited by
- 4,309
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 964 · 2025: 887 · 2024: 693 · 2023: 599 · 2022: 523 · 2021: 345 · 2020: 235 · 2019: 61 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 229.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.utwente.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (CA-D-PPA-2131-H)
- Institute of Population and Public Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
- Keywords
- crop pathogens, crop pests, yield loss, food security, wheat, rice, maize, potato, soybean, crop health management, agroecosystem sustainability
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Food Supply, Insecta, Mites, Crops, Agricultural, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Climate Change, Plant Weeds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review