Cited by 342Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCellular Mechanics and Interactions3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(l-lactide)

Wan, Yuqing, Wang, Yong, Liu, Zhimin, Qu, Xue, Han, Buxing, Bei, Jianzhong, Wang, Shenguo·2005·Biomaterials

Abstract

The impact of the surface topography of polylactone-type polymer on cell adhesion was to be concerned because the micro-scale texture of a surface can provide a significant effect on the adhesion behavior of cells on the surface. Especially for the application of tissue engineering scaffold, the pore size could have an influence on cell in-growth and subsequent proliferation. Micro-fabrication technology was used to generate specific topography to investigate the relationship between the cells and surface. In this study the pits-patterned surfaces of polystyrene (PS) film with diameters 2.2 and 0.45 microm were prepared by phase-separation, and the corresponding scale islands-patterned PLLA surface was prepared by a molding technique using the pits-patterned PS as a template. The adhesion and proliferation behavior of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells morphology on the pits- and islands-patterned surface were characterized by SEM observation, cell attachment efficiency measurement and MTT assay. The results showed that the cell adhesion could be enhanced on PLLA and PS surface with nano-scale and micro-scale roughness compared to the smooth surfaces of the PLLA and PS. The OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells could grow along the surface with two different size islands of PLLA and grow inside the micro-scale pits of the PS. However, the proliferation of cells on the micro- and nano-scale patterned surface has not been enhanced compared with the controlled smooth surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.016

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cells in the body perform bioactivities in response to stimulation from a highly complex, 3D microenvironment.

    “Cells in our body perform bioactivities in response to the stimulation from a highly complex, 3D microenvironment (15,98,112).”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [112]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Qu, X., Han, B., Bei, J., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shenguo
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
26
Issue
21
Pages
4453-4459
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019520860
Cited by
342
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 27
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
cell adhesion, cell proliferation, poly(L-lactic acid), surface topography, polystyrene template, phase separation, tissue engineering scaffolds, surface roughness
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Humans, Materials Testing, Osteoblasts, Polyesters, Surface Properties, Cell Culture Techniques, Tissue Engineering, Cell Size, Cell Proliferation, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review