The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of surface finish and residual stresses on the ageing sensitivity of biomedical grade zirconia
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate in this paper the influence of surface finish on the ageing kinetics of biomedical grade zirconia. The critical influence of polishing has been systematically investigated by optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The stress state around polishing scratches gives rise to preferential transformation in the zone of the induced scratches and consequently to accelerated ageing. The influence of residual stresses is analyzed semi-quantitatively by preparing samples with various surface finish, thus with various stress states. Rough polishing produces a compressive surface stress layer beneficial for the ageing resistance, while smooth polishing produces preferential transformation nucleation around scratches. When a thermal treatment of 2h at 1200 degrees C is applied to relax the residual stresses, all the surfaces states exhibit the same sensitivity to ageing. These results demonstrate that roughness alone cannot be used for ensuring a long-term stability. The variation of ageing sensitivity is indeed related indirectly to the surface roughness via the induced surface stress state. The current ISO standards are not able to take these effects into account. Indeed, great variations in ageing kinetics were observed for samples with different surface states, although all well below the ISO requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phase Analysis in Zirconia Systems
Garvie, R. C., & Nicholson, P. S. (1972) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11290.x · Cited by 1,444
Low‐Temperature Aging of Y‐TZP Ceramics
Chevalier, J., Cales, B., & Drouin, J. M. (1999) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02055.x · Cited by 713
Self-citationEnvironmental degradation of zirconia ceramics
Lawson, S. (1995) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/0955-2219(95)00035-s · Cited by 460
Chevalier, J., Deville, S., Münch, E., Jullian, R., & Lair, F. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.002 · Cited by 385
Self-citation
Cited by
The Tetragonal‐Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends
Chevalier, J., Gremillard, L., Virkar, A. V., & Clarke, D. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x · Cited by 1,609
Self-citationWhat future for zirconia as a biomaterial?
Chevalier, J. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.034 · Cited by 1,228
Self-citationZirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications
Gautam, C., Joyner, J., Gautam, A., Rao, J., & Vajtai, R. (2016) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c6dt03484e · Cited by 395
Revolution of Current Dental Zirconia: A Comprehensive Review
Alqutaibi, A. Y., Ghulam, O., Krsoum, M., Binmahmoud, S., Taher, H., Elmalky, W., & Zafar, M. S. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27051699 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Deville, S., Chevalier, J., & Gremillard, L.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2186-2192
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085665247
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of surface finish and residual stresses on the ageing sensitivity of biomedical grade zirconia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.021
- The paper
- Deville, S., Chevalier, J., & Gremillard, L. (2006). Influence of surface finish and residual stresses on the ageing sensitivity of biomedical grade zirconia. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.