Practical recombinant hybrid mussel bioadhesive fp-151
Abstract
Mussel adhesive proteins (MAPs) have received increased attention as potential environmentally friendly adhesives under aqueous conditions and in medicine. However, attempts to produce functional recombinant MAPs (mainly foot protein type 1, fp-1) by several expression systems have failed. Even though we previously reported a functional expression of recombinant foot protein type 5 (fp-5) with significant adhesive ability in Escherichia coli, its practical use was limited by several problems such as low production yield, low purification yield, and high levels of post-purification insolubility. Here, to overcome these limitations, we designed and constructed the novel type of hybrid mussel bioadhesive fp-151, a fusion protein comprising six fp-1 decapeptide repeats at each fp-5 terminus. Using micro- and bulk-scale characterization and mammalian cell-adhesion analyses, we demonstrate that fp-151 has the potential to be a practical bioadhesive with strong adhesive ability, a simple purification process ( approximately 1g-purified protein per 1l-pilot-scale fed-batch bioreactor culture), proper manipulation properties ( approximately 330g/l solubility), and high biocompatibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The yield of extraction of mussel adhesive proteins is extremely low.
“The yield of extraction of mussel adhesive proteins is extremely low [46].”
From Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
Dou, W., Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., & Li, S. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25169100 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“The yield of extraction of mussel adhesive proteins is extremely low [46]. adhesive hydrogels.”
BackgroundLee, S. Y., Thow, S. Y., Abdullah, S., Ng, M. H., & Mohamed Haflah, N. H. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s362144 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hwang, D. S., Gim, Y., Yoo, H. J., & Cha, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
- ORCID
- Hwang, Dong Soo
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3560-3568
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069777522
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
- Ministry of Education, Kenya
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
- Keywords
- mussel adhesive proteins, recombinant fusion protein, bioadhesives, aqueous adhesives, protein purification, biocompatibility, cell adhesion, Escherichia coli expression, fed-batch bioreactor, protein solubility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Cricetulus, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Cricetinae, Humans, Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Tissue Adhesives, Blotting, Western, CHO Cells, DNA Primers, Bivalvia, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review