Cited by 209Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsTendon Structure and TreatmentBone Tissue Engineering Materials

In vivo study of anterior cruciate ligament regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells and silk scaffold

Fan, Hongbin, Liu, Haifeng, Wong, Eugene J.W., Toh, Siew L., Goh, James C.H.·2008·Biomaterials

Abstract

Although most in vitro studies indicate that silk is a suitable biomaterial for ligament tissue engineering, in vivo studies of implanted silk scaffolds for ligament reconstruction are still lacking. The objective of this study is to investigate anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and silk scaffold. The scaffold was fabricated by incorporating microporous silk sponges into knitted silk mesh, which mimicked the structures of ligament extracellular matrix (ECM). In vitro culture demonstrated that MSCs on scaffolds proliferated vigorously and produced abundant collagen. The transcription levels of ligament-specific genes also increased with time. Then MSCs/scaffold was implanted to regenerate ACL in vivo. After 24 weeks, histology observation showed that MSCs were distributed throughout the regenerated ligament and exhibited fibroblast morphology. The key ligament ECM components including collagen I, collagen III, and tenascin-C were produced prominently. Furthermore, direct ligament-bone insertion with typical four zones (bone, mineralized fibrocartilage, fibrocartilage, ligament) was reconstructed, which resembled the native structure of ACL-bone insertion. The tensile strength of regenerated ligament also met the mechanical requirements. Moreover, its histological grading score was significantly higher than that of control. In conclusion, the results imply that silk scaffold has great potentials in future clinical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, H., Liu, H., Wong, E. J. W., Toh, S. L., & Goh, J. C. H.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Goh, James C.H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
29
Issue
23
Pages
3324-3337
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051900137
Cited by
209
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, silk scaffolds, ligament tissue engineering, collagen synthesis, tenascin-C, tensile strength, in vivo implantation
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cells, Cultured, Collagen, DNA, Materials Testing, Rabbits, Regeneration, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Transcription, Genetic, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Tissue Engineering, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Silk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review