Replacement of animal-derived collagen matrix by human fibroblast-derived dermal matrix for human skin equivalent products
Abstract
Reconstructed human skin equivalents (HSEs) are representative models of human skin and widely used for research purposes and clinical applications. Traditional methods to generate HSEs are based on the seeding of human keratinocytes onto three-dimensional human fibroblast-populated non-human collagen matrices. Current HSEs have a limited lifespan of approximately 8 weeks, rendering them unsuitable for long-term studies. Here we present a new generation of HSEs being fully composed of human components and which can be cultured up to 20 weeks. This model is generated on a primary human fibroblast-derived dermal matrix. Pro-collagen type I secretion by human fibroblasts stabilized during long-term culture, providing a continuous and functional human dermal matrix. In contrast to rat-tail collagen-based HSEs, the present fibroblast-derived matrix-based HSEs contain more continuity in the number of viable cell layers in long-term cultures. In addition, these new skin models exhibit normal differentiation and proliferation, based on expression of K10/K15, and K16/K17, respectively. Detection of collagen types IV and VII and laminin 332 was confined to the epidermal-dermal junction, as in native skin. The presence of hemidesmosomes and anchoring fibrils was demonstrated by electron microscopy. Finally, we show that the presented HSE contained a higher concentration of the normal moisturizing factor compared to rat-tail collagen-based skin models, providing a further representation of functional normal human skin in vitro. This study, therefore, demonstrates the role of the dermal microenvironment on epidermal regeneration and lifespan in vitro.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HSE composition and culture conditions vary greatly from lab to lab, which can affect interpretation of similar experiments.
“their composition and culture conditions vary greatly from lab to lab, which can affect interpretation of similar experiments.”
From Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
HSEs have long served as models of human IFE in place of murine skin.
“HSEs have long served as models of human IFE in place of murine skin.7,18,66,67”
From Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Moisturization and skin barrier function
Rawlings, A. V., & Harding, C. R. (2004) · Dermatologic Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04s1005.x · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Epidermal stem and progenitor cells in murine epidermis accumulate UV damage despite NER proficiency
Nijhof, J. G. W., van Pelt, C., Mulder, A. A., Mitchell, D. L., Mullenders, L. H. F., & de Gruijl, F. R. (2006) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgl213 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mieremet, A., Vázquez García, A., Boiten, W., van Dijk, R., Gooris, G., Bouwstra, J. A., & El Ghalbzouri, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44204-4 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids
Stabell, A. R., Lee, G. E., Jia, Y., Wong, K. N., Wang, S., Ling, J., Nguyen, S. D., Sen, G. L., Nie, Q., & Atwood, S. X. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112511 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Organotypic cultures as aging associated disease models
Sanchez, M. M., Bagdasarian, I. A., Darch, W., & Morgan, J. T. (2022) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.204361 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- El Ghalbzouri, A., Commandeur, S., Rietveld, M. H., Mulder, A. A., & Willemze, R.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-78
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094592880
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Keywords
- long-term culture, keratinocyte differentiation, hemidesmosomes, anchoring fibrils, basement membrane zone, epidermal regeneration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Basement Membrane, Cell Differentiation, Culture Media, Extracellular Matrix, Fibroblasts, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Tail, Biomarkers, Keratinocytes, Skin, Artificial, Ki-67 Antigen, Dermis, Tissue Engineering, Collagen Type I, Cell Proliferation, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review