The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell infiltration and growth in a low density, uncompressed three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffold
Open accessAbstract
A limiting factor of traditional electrospinning is that the electrospun scaffolds consist entirely of tightly packed nanofiber layers that only provide a superficial porous structure due to the sheet-like assembly process. This unavoidable characteristic hinders cell infiltration and growth throughout the nanofibrous scaffolds. Numerous strategies have been tried to overcome this challenge, including the incorporation of nanoparticles, using larger microfibers, or removing embedded salt or water-soluble fibers to increase porosity. However, these methods still produce sheet-like nanofibrous scaffolds, failing to create a porous three-dimensional scaffold with good structural integrity. Thus, we have developed a three-dimensional cotton ball-like electrospun scaffold that consists of an accumulation of nanofibers in a low density and uncompressed manner. Instead of a traditional flat-plate collector, a grounded spherical dish and an array of needle-like probes were used to create a Focused, Low density, Uncompressed nanoFiber (FLUF) mesh scaffold. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the cotton ball-like scaffold consisted of electrospun nanofibers with a similar diameter but larger pores and less dense structure compared to the traditional electrospun scaffolds. In addition, laser confocal microscopy demonstrated an open porosity and loosely packed structure throughout the depth of the cotton ball-like scaffold, contrasting the superficially porous and tightly packed structure of the traditional electrospun scaffold. Cells seeded on the cotton ball-like scaffold infiltrated into the scaffold after 7 days of growth, compared to no penetrating growth for the traditional electrospun scaffold. Quantitative analysis showed approximately a 40% higher growth rate for cells on the cotton ball-like scaffold over a 7 day period, possibly due to the increased space for in-growth within the three-dimensional scaffolds. Overall, this method assembles a nanofibrous scaffold that is more advantageous for highly porous interconnectivity and demonstrates great potential for tackling current challenges of electrospun scaffolds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keun Kwon, I., Kidoaki, S., & Matsuda, T. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.007 · Cited by 607
Feng, Z.-Q., Chu, X., Huang, N.-P., Wang, T., Wang, Y., Shi, X., Ding, Y., & Gu, Z.-Z. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.053 · Cited by 216
Cited by
Yang, G., Li, X., He, Y., Ma, J., Ni, G., & Zhou, S. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003 · Cited by 336
Phipps, M. C., Clem, W. C., Grunda, J. M., Clines, G. A., & Bellis, S. L. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.080 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Blakeney, B. A., Tambralli, A., Anderson, J. M., Andukuri, A., Lim, D.-J., Dean, D. R., & Jun, H.-W.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1583-1590
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035182362
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell infiltration and growth in a low density, uncompressed three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.056
- The paper
- Blakeney, B. A., Tambralli, A., Anderson, J. M., Andukuri, A., Lim, D.-J., Dean, D. R., & Jun, H.-W. (2011). Cell infiltration and growth in a low density, uncompressed three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.