Cited by 287Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Increasing the pore sizes of bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds comprised of polycaprolactone, collagen I and hydroxyapatite to enhance cell infiltration

Open access
Phipps, Matthew C., Clem, William C., Grunda, Jessica M., Clines, Gregory A., Bellis, Susan L.·2012·Biomaterials

Abstract

Bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds consisting of polycaprolactone (PCL), collagen I and nanoparticulate hydroxyapatite (HA) have previously been shown to support the adhesion, integrin-related signaling and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), suggesting these matrices serve as promising degradable substrates for osteoregeneration. However, the small pore sizes in electrospun scaffolds hinder cell infiltration in vitro and tissue-ingrowth into the scaffold in vivo, limiting their clinical potential. In this study, three separate techniques were evaluated for their capability to increase the pore size of the PCL/col I/nanoHA scaffolds: limited protease digestion, decreasing the fiber packing density during electrospinning, and inclusion of sacrificial fibers of the water-soluble polymer PEO. The PEO sacrificial fiber approach was found to be the most effective in increasing scaffold pore size. Furthermore, the use of sacrificial fibers promoted increased MSC infiltration into the scaffolds, as well as greater infiltration of endogenous cells within bone upon placement of scaffolds within calvarial organ cultures. These collective findings support the use of sacrificial PEO fibers as a means to increase the porosity of complex, bone-mimicking electrospun scaffolds, thereby enhancing tissue regenerative processes that depend upon cell infiltration, such as vascularization and replacement of the scaffold with native bone tissue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.080

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prepared scaffold had a pore size too small for cell infiltration.

    “As the pore size of the prepared scaffold was less, there was no cell infiltration process.”

    From Nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen composite as scaffold material for bone regeneration. (2023) · cites this paper as [76]

    Results §3.2 reports that MSCs remained largely on the surface of collagenase-treated scaffolds, with negligible infiltration; the Discussion says the pores created by that treatment were insufficient for MSC infiltration. But Results §3.6 measures some infiltration even in scaffolds without PEO (6.13 μm), and substantially more in scaffolds made with PEO. The source supports limited infiltration in the smaller-pored scaffolds, not an absolute absence of infiltration in all prepared scaffolds. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Phipps et al. prepared an electrospun scaffold using polycaprolactone, HA, and collagen.

    “Phipps et al [76] prepared an electrospun scaffold using polycaprolactone, HA, and collagen.”
  • Introducing water-soluble PEO as a sacrificial polymer and removing it with water introduced more pores in the electrospun scaffold.

    “Here, the PEO acted as a sacrificial polymer where after the electrospinning process, the scaffold was treated with water to remove PEO introducing more pores in the scaffold (figures 5(e)-(g)).”
  • MSCs were present only on the surface of the scaffold in the cell infiltration analysis.

    “Figures 5(h) and (i) demonstrate that the MSCs were present only on the surface”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phipps, M. C., Clem, W. C., Grunda, J. M., Clines, G. A., & Bellis, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Bellis, Susan L.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
524-534
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053585356
Cited by
287
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR051539, R01AR51539, P30AR048311)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB004312)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
electrospun scaffolds, pore size, polycaprolactone, type I collagen, hydroxyapatite, mesenchymal stem cells, cell infiltration, poly(ethylene oxide), porosity, osteoregeneration, vascularization, tissue ingrowth
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Adhesion, Extracellular Matrix, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Porosity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Durapatite, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering, Collagen Type I, Biomimetic Materials, Cell Proliferation, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review