The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape
Open accessAbstract
Stem cell response to a library of scaffolds with varied 3D structures was investigated. Microarray screening revealed that each type of scaffold structure induced a unique gene expression signature in primary human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that treatments sorted by scaffold structure and not by polymer chemistry suggesting that scaffold structure was more influential than scaffold composition. Further, the effects of scaffold structure on hBMSC function were mediated by cell shape. Of all the scaffolds tested, only scaffolds with a nanofibrous morphology were able to drive the hBMSCs down an osteogenic lineage in the absence of osteogenic supplements. Nanofiber scaffolds forced the hBMSCs to assume an elongated, highly branched morphology. This same morphology was seen in osteogenic controls where hBMSCs were cultured on flat polymer films in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OS). In contrast, hBMSCs cultured on flat polymer films in the absence of OS assumed a more rounded and less-branched morphology. These results indicate that cells are more sensitive to scaffold structure than previously appreciated and suggest that scaffold efficacy can be optimized by tailoring the scaffold structure to force cells into morphologies that direct them to differentiate down the desired lineage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., Krause, D. S., Deans, R. J., Keating, A., Prockop, D. J., & Horwitz, E. M. (2006) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1080/14653240600855905 · Cited by 17,766
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607
Role of cell shape in growth control
Folkman, J., & Moscona, A. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273345a0 · Cited by 2,422
Cited by
Luo, Y., Shen, H., Fang, Y., Cao, Y., Huang, J., Zhang, M., Dai, J., Shi, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b00862 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, G., Tison, C. K., Chatterjee, K., Pine, P. S., McDaniel, J. H., Salit, M. L., Young, M. F., & Simon, C. G.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 9188-9196
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062465982
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.054
- The paper
- Kumar, G., Tison, C. K., Chatterjee, K., Pine, P. S., McDaniel, J. H., Salit, M. L., Young, M. F., & Simon, C. G. (2011). The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.