Cited by 107Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

The effect of detergent-based decellularization procedures on cellular proteins and immunogenicity in equine carotid artery grafts

Böer, Ulrike, Lohrenz, Andrea, Klingenberg, Melanie, Pich, Andreas, Haverich, Axel, Wilhelmi, Mathias·2011·Biomaterials

Abstract

Decellularized equine carotid arteries (dEAC) may represent a reasonable alternative to alloplastic materials in vascular replacement therapy. Acellularity of the matrix is standardly evaluated by DNA quantification what however may not record sufficiently the degree of matrix immunogenicity. Thus, our aim was to analyze dEAC with a low DNA content for residual cellular proteins. A detergent-based decellularization protocol including endonuclease treatment resulted in dEAC with 0.6 ± 0.15 ng DNA/mg dry weight representing 0.33 ± 0.14% of native tissue DNA content. In contrast, when matrices were homogenized and extracted by high detergent concentrations westernblot analyses revealed cytosolic and cytosceleton proteins like GAPDH and smooth muscle actin which were depleted to 4.1 ± 1.9% and 13.8 ± 0.55%, resp. Also putative immunogenic MHC I complexes and the alpha-Gal epitop were reduced to only 14.8 ± 1.2% and 15.1 ± 2.05%. Mass spectrometry of matrix extracts identified 306 proteins belonging to cytosol, organelles, nucleus and cell membrane. Moreover, aqueous matrix extracts evoked a pronounced antibody formation when administered in mice and thus display high immunogenic potential. Our data indicate that an established decellularization protocol which results in acellular matrices evaluated by low DNA content reduces but not eliminates cellular components which may contribute to its immunogenic potential in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Böer, U., Lohrenz, A., Klingenberg, M., Pich, A., Haverich, A., & Wilhelmi, M.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Böer, Ulrike
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
32
Issue
36
Pages
9730-9737
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006864740
Cited by
107
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
“Innovation Fund of Lower Saxony, Germany: GMP model laboratory tissue engineering”.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
decellularization, vascular grafts, immunogenicity, DNA content, alpha-gal epitope, MHC class I, smooth muscle actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, antibody response, acellular matrix
MeSH terms
Actins, alpha-Galactosidase, Animals, Antibodies, Antibody Specificity, Epitopes, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Carotid Arteries, Cell Extracts, Detergents, Horses, Immunization, Muscle, Smooth, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Tissue Engineering, Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating), Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review