The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent a promising and clinically relevant cell source for tissue engineering applications. As such, guiding MSCs towards specific lineages maintaining these phenotypes has been particularly challenging as the contributions of mechanical, chemical and structural cues to the complex differentiation process are largely unknown. To fully harness the potential of MSCs for regenerative medicine, a systematic investigation into the individual and combined effects of these stimuli is needed. In addition, unlike chemical stimulation, for which temporal and concentration gradients are difficult to control, mechanical stimulation and scaffold-based cues may be relatively more biomimetic and can be applied with greater control to ensure fidelity in MSC differentiation. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of nanofiber matrix alignment and mechanical stimulation on MSC differentiation, focusing on elucidating the relative contribution of each parameter in guided regeneration of functional connective tissues. It is observed nanofiber alignment directs MSC response to physiological loading and that fibroblastic differentiation requires a combination of physiologically-relevant cell-material interactions in conjunction with mechanical stimulation. Importantly, the results of this study reveal that systemic and readily controllable cues, such as scaffold alignment and optimized mechanical stimulation, are sufficient to drive MSC differentiation, without the need for additional chemical stimuli. Moreover, these findings also yield a set of fundamental design rules can be readily applied to connective tissue regeneration strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493529 · Cited by 9,893
Marrow Stromal Cells as Stem Cells for Nonhematopoietic Tissues
Prockop, D. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.71 · Cited by 4,629
Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning
Reneker, D. H., & Chun, I. (1996) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 · Cited by 3,520
A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering
Yoshimoto, H., Shin, Y. M., Terai, H., & Vacanti, J. P. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x · Cited by 1,977
Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus
Wang, N., Tytell, J. D., & Ingber, D. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2594 · Cited by 1,762
In Search of the In Vivo Identity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
da Silva Meirelles, L., Caplan, A. I., & Nardi, N. B. (2008) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-1122 · Cited by 1,077
Pham, Q. P., Sharma, U., & Mikos, A. G. (2006) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm060680j · Cited by 956
DiGirolamo, C. M., Stokes, D., Colter, D., Phinney, D. G., Class, R., & Prockop, D. J. (1999) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01715.x · Cited by 879
Analysis of the tendon cell fate using Scleraxis, a specific marker for tendons and ligaments
Schweitzer, R., Chyung, J. H., Murtaugh, L. C., Brent, A. E., Rosen, V., Olson, E. N., Lassar, A., & Tabin, C. J. (2001) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128.19.3855 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering
Narayanan, G., Vernekar, V. N., Kuyinu, E. L., & Laurencin, C. T. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.015 · Cited by 484
Engineering fiber anisotropy within natural collagen hydrogels
Ahmed, A., Joshi, I. M., Mansouri, M., Ahamed, N. N. N., Hsu, M.-C., Gaborski, T. R., & Abhyankar, V. V. (2021) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00036.2021 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Subramony, S. D., Dargis, B. R., Castillo, M., Azeloglu, E. U., Tracey, M. S., Su, A., & Lu, H. H.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1942-1953
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968269253
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012
- The paper
- Subramony, S. D., Dargis, B. R., Castillo, M., Azeloglu, E. U., Tracey, M. S., Su, A., & Lu, H. H. (2013). The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.