Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation

Open access
Subramony, Siddarth D., Dargis, Booth R., Castillo, Mario, Azeloglu, Evren U., Tracey, Michael S., Su, Amanda, Lu, Helen H.·2013·Biomaterials

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent a promising and clinically relevant cell source for tissue engineering applications. As such, guiding MSCs towards specific lineages maintaining these phenotypes has been particularly challenging as the contributions of mechanical, chemical and structural cues to the complex differentiation process are largely unknown. To fully harness the potential of MSCs for regenerative medicine, a systematic investigation into the individual and combined effects of these stimuli is needed. In addition, unlike chemical stimulation, for which temporal and concentration gradients are difficult to control, mechanical stimulation and scaffold-based cues may be relatively more biomimetic and can be applied with greater control to ensure fidelity in MSC differentiation. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of nanofiber matrix alignment and mechanical stimulation on MSC differentiation, focusing on elucidating the relative contribution of each parameter in guided regeneration of functional connective tissues. It is observed nanofiber alignment directs MSC response to physiological loading and that fibroblastic differentiation requires a combination of physiologically-relevant cell-material interactions in conjunction with mechanical stimulation. Importantly, the results of this study reveal that systemic and readily controllable cues, such as scaffold alignment and optimized mechanical stimulation, are sufficient to drive MSC differentiation, without the need for additional chemical stimuli. Moreover, these findings also yield a set of fundamental design rules can be readily applied to connective tissue regeneration strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Subramony, S. D., Dargis, B. R., Castillo, M., Azeloglu, E. U., Tracey, M. S., Su, A., & Lu, H. H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1942-1953
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968269253
Cited by
274
References
58
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012
The paper
Subramony, S. D., Dargis, B. R., Castillo, M., Azeloglu, E. U., Tracey, M. S., Su, A., & Lu, H. H. (2013). The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.