Cited by 339Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs

Liu, Huanhuan, Peng, Hongju, Wu, Yan, Zhang, Can, Cai, Youzhi, Xu, Guowei, Li, Qin, Chen, Xiao +3 more·2013·Biomaterials

Abstract

In bone tissue engineering, a combination of biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds with renewable stem cells has recently emerged as a new strategy for promoting bone regeneration. We have previously developed a biomimetic nanocomposite nanofibrous scaffold of hydroxyapatite/chitosan (nHAp/CTS) [1]. However, the mechanism behind the supportive function of the scaffolds has not yet been adequately explored. Here, we evaluated the effect of nHAp/CTS seeded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on bone regeneration and examined the underlying mechanism in vitro and in vivo. The scaffolds of nHAp/CTS induced higher proliferation of BMSCs than membranous hydroxyapatite/chitosan (mHAp/CTS) and electrospun nanofibrous chitosan (nCTS) did. Interestingly, regardless the nanfibrous effect, nHAp/CTS and mHAp/CTS supported the spindle-shaped morphology, in contrast to the spherical shape of BMSCs on nCTS, indicating that HAp supports cell adhesion. Furthermore, the levels of the mRNA for Smad1, BMP-2/4, Runx2, ALP, collagen I, integrin subunits together with myosins were significantly up-regulated on nHAp/CTS whereas these genes were expressed at markedly low levels on mHAp/CTS and nCTS even in osteogenic medium. In addition, the critical proteins pSmad1/5/8 in BMP pathway showed clear nuclear localization and osteocalcin were significantly elevated on nHAp/CTS than mHAp/CTS (P < 0.01) and nCTS (P < 0.01). Similarly, the cells exhibited higher ALP activity on nHAp/CTS than mHAp/CTS (P < 0.01) and nCTS (P < 0.05). Therefore, the findings indicated the activating of intergrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway of BMSCs on nHAp/CTS. Finally, in vivo, nHAp/CTS/BMSCs had a superior ability of bone reconstruction than other groups for cranial bone defects. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that nHAp/CTS scaffold promotes bone regeneration by supporting the adhesion, proliferation and activating integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway of BMSCs both in vitro and in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.048

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydroxyapatite can interact with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and enhance BMSC proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization through signaling pathways including ERK/Sox9, BMP/Smad, Wnt/beta-catenin, TGF-beta, and MAPK.

    “Hydroxyapatite, a natural apatite mineral, has the capacity to interact with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and enhance BMSC proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization through its action on various signaling pathways, including ERK/Sox9, BMP/Smad, Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, and MAPK [64,65,66,67,68].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Peng, H., Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Cai, Y., Xu, G., Li, Q., Chen, X., Ji, J., Zhang, Y., & OuYang, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Donghua University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Yanzhong
  • OuYang, Hong Wei
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
34
Issue
18
Pages
4404-4417
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058774857
Cited by
339
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 7
FWCI
19.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
bone regeneration, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, Smad1/5/8, osteogenic differentiation, cell adhesion, cell proliferation, cranial bone defects
MeSH terms
Alkaline Phosphatase, Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Bone Regeneration, Cell Separation, Extracellular Matrix, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Membranes, Artificial, Osteogenesis, Radiography, Skull, Signal Transduction, Osteocalcin, Integrins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Durapatite, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Implants, Experimental, Chitosan, Cell Shape, Cell Proliferation, Rats, Smad Proteins, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review