Cited by 49Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNerve injury and regeneration

A histological analysis of human median and ulnar nerves following implantation of Utah slanted electrode arrays

Christensen, Michael B., Wark, Heather A.C., Hutchinson, Douglas T.·2016·Biomaterials

Abstract

For decades, epineurial electrodes have been used in clinical therapies involving the stimulation of peripheral nerves. However, next generation peripheral nerve interfaces for applications such as neuroprosthetics would benefit from an increased ability to selectively stimulate and record from nerve tissue. This increased selectivity may require the use of more invasive devices, such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array (USEA). Previous research with USEAs has described the histological response to the implantation of these devices in cats and rats; however, no such data has been presented in humans. Therefore, we describe here the degree of penetration and foreign body reaction to USEAs after a four-week implantation period in human median and ulnar nerves. We found that current array designs penetrate a relatively small percentage of the available endoneurial tissue in these large nerves. When electrode tips were located within the endoneurial tissue, labels for axons and myelin were found in close proximity to electrodes. Consistent with other reports, we found activated macrophages attached to explanted devices, as well as within the tissue surrounding the implantation site. Despite this inflammatory response, devices were able to successfully record single- or multi-unit action potentials and elicit sensory percepts. However, modifying device design to allow for greater nerve penetration, as well as mitigating the inflammatory response to such devices, would likely increase device performance and should be investigated in future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surgical techniques required to implant intrafascicular electrodes could be intense and time-consuming, since it may require additional manipulation of the nerve beyond its exposure.

    “Surgical techniques required to implant these electrodes could be intense and time-consuming, since it may require additional manipulation of the nerve beyond its exposure [35, 36].”
  • Studies have reported difficulties with penetrating the fascicular space despite deliberate attempts to do so.

    “Studies have reported difficulties with penetrating the fascicular space despite deliberate attempts to do so [36, 56].”
  • Despite modified designs tailored to the peripheral nerves showing promising performance in long-term tests, the use of silicon-based implants in the PNS is limited.

    “Despite the fact that modified designs tailored to the peripheral nerves have shown promising performance in long-term tests (Branner et al. 2004; Christenses et al. 2016), their use in the PNS is limited.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 49

Authors
Christensen, M. B., Wark, H. A. C., & Hutchinson, D. T.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Michael B.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
77
Pages
235-242
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154271692
Cited by
49
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Utah
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
peripheral nerve interfaces, median nerve, ulnar nerve, foreign body reaction, macrophage activation, myelinated axons, neuroprosthetics, peripheral nerve stimulation, electrophysiological recording
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amputation Stumps, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Axons, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Forearm, Foreign-Body Reaction, Humans, Macrophage Activation, Median Nerve, Microelectrodes, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Myelin Sheath, Peripheral Nerves, Phantom Limb, Sensation, Ulnar Nerve, Antibiotic Prophylaxis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review