A systematic investigation of the effect of the fluid shear stress on Caco-2 cells towards the optimization of epithelial organ-on-chip models
Abstract
Epithelial cells experience constant mechanical forces, including fluid shear stress (FSS) on their apical surface. These forces alter both structure and function. While precise recapitulation of the complex mechanobiology of organs remains challenging, better understanding of the effect of mechanical stimuli is necessary towards the development of biorelevant in vitro models. This is especially relevant to organs-on-chip models which allow for fine control of the culture environment. In this study, the effects of the FSS on Caco-2 cell monolayers were systematically determined using a microfluidic device based on Hele-Shaw geometry. This approach allowed for a physiologically relevant range of FSS (from ∼0 to 0.03 dyn/cm 2 ) to be applied to the cells within a single device. Exposure to microfluidic FSS induced significant phenotypical and functional changes in Caco-2 cell monolayers as compared to cells grown in static conditions. The application of FSS significantly altered the production of mucus, expression of tight junctions, vacuolization, organization of cytoskeleton, formation of microvilli, mitochondrial activity and expression of cytochrome P450. In the context of the intestinal epithelium, this detailed understanding of the effects of the FSS will enable the realization of in vitro organs-on-chip models with well-defined and tailored characteristics to a specific purpose, including for drug and nanoparticle absorption studies. The Hele-Shaw approach used in this s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mean FSS range for intestinal cells was in the physiologically relevant range and could promote gut cell barrier formation and differentiation.
“which was in the physiologically relevant range 26,27 and could promote gut cell barrier formation and differentiation process.28,29”
From Gut-liver-axis microphysiological system for studying cellular fluidic shear stress and inter-tissue interaction (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Kim, H. J., Huh, D., Hamilton, G., & Ingber, D. E. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40074j · Cited by 1,734 · see citing works
Physiology of Intestinal Absorption and Secretion
Kiela, P. R., & Ghishan, F. K. (2016) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.007 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Gut-on-a-Chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation
Kim, H. J., & Ingber, D. E. (2013) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c3ib40126j · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Microfluidic Organ-on-a-Chip Models of Human Intestine
Bein, A., Shin, W., Jalili-Firoozinezhad, S., Park, M. H., Sontheimer-Phelps, A., Tovaglieri, A., Chalkiadaki, A., Kim, H. J., & Ingber, D. E. (2018) · Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.010 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, J., Hirai, Y., Imamura, S., Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., & Kamei, K.-I. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.31.478467 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Delon, L. C., Guo, Z., Oszmiana, A., Chien, C.-C., Gibson, R., Prestidge, C., & Thierry, B.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 225
- Pages
- 119521
- ISSN
- 0142-9612
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review