Cited by 168

A systematic investigation of the effect of the fluid shear stress on Caco-2 cells towards the optimization of epithelial organ-on-chip models

Delon, Ludivine C., Guo, Zhaobin, Oszmiana, Anna, Chien, Chia-Chi, Gibson, Rachel, Prestidge, Clive, Thierry, Benjamin·2019·Biomaterials

Abstract

Epithelial cells experience constant mechanical forces, including fluid shear stress (FSS) on their apical surface. These forces alter both structure and function. While precise recapitulation of the complex mechanobiology of organs remains challenging, better understanding of the effect of mechanical stimuli is necessary towards the development of biorelevant in vitro models. This is especially relevant to organs-on-chip models which allow for fine control of the culture environment. In this study, the effects of the FSS on Caco-2 cell monolayers were systematically determined using a microfluidic device based on Hele-Shaw geometry. This approach allowed for a physiologically relevant range of FSS (from ∼0 to 0.03 dyn/cm 2 ) to be applied to the cells within a single device. Exposure to microfluidic FSS induced significant phenotypical and functional changes in Caco-2 cell monolayers as compared to cells grown in static conditions. The application of FSS significantly altered the production of mucus, expression of tight junctions, vacuolization, organization of cytoskeleton, formation of microvilli, mitochondrial activity and expression of cytochrome P450. In the context of the intestinal epithelium, this detailed understanding of the effects of the FSS will enable the realization of in vitro organs-on-chip models with well-defined and tailored characteristics to a specific purpose, including for drug and nanoparticle absorption studies. The Hele-Shaw approach used in this s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119521

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delon, L. C., Guo, Z., Oszmiana, A., Chien, C.-C., Gibson, R., Prestidge, C., & Thierry, B.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
225
Pages
119521
ISSN
0142-9612
Cited by
168
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Australian Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review