Cited by 61Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization

The discrepancy between plot and field yields: harvest and storage losses of switchgrass

Monti, A., Fazio, S., Venturi, G.·2009·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.01.006

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monti, A., Fazio, S., & Venturi, G.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Monti, A.
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
841-847
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127794553
Cited by
61
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Keywords
switchgrass, biomass yield, harvest losses, storage losses, moisture content, microbial degradation, harvest time, field slope, biofuel quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review