Cited by 79Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementWood Residue Utilization and Solid BiofuelsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Forest treatment residues for thermal energy compared with disposal by onsite burning: Emissions and energy return

Jones, Greg, Loeffler, Dan, Calkin, David, Chung, Woodam·2010·Biomass and Bioenergy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recovering slash for energy purposes (e.g., combusted in combined heat and power stations) could produce electric power and heat in a manner that considerably reduces both the use of fossil fuels and CO2 emissions.

    “If the slash were recovered for energy purposes (e.g., combusted in combined heat and power stations), both electric power and heat could be produced in a manner that considerably reduced both the use of fossil fuels and CO 2 emissions (Jones et al. 2010).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Malmsheimer, 2008, Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States, Journal of Forestry, 106, 115, 10.1093/jof/106.3.115 · DOI
  2. Zerbe, 2006, Thermal energy, electricity, and transportation fuels from wood, Forest Products Journal, 56, 6
  3. Loeffler, 2006, Estimating volumes and costs of forest biomass in western Montana using forest inventory and geospatial data, Forest Products Journal, 56, 31
  4. Birdsey, 2006, Forest carbon management in the United States: 1600–2100, Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1461, 10.2134/jeq2005.0162 · DOI
  5. Fried, 2004, FIA BioSum: a tool to evaluate financial costs, opportunities and effectiveness of fuel treatments, Western Forester
  6. Skog, 2008, Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States, Forest Products Journal, 58, 56
  7. Markewitz, 2006, The carbon costs of silvicultural activities: impacts on carbon sequestration in forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 236, 153, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.343 · DOI
  8. Fiedler, 1999, Product and economic implications of ecological restoration, Forest Products Journal, 42, 19
  9. Stokes, 1992, Harvesting small trees and forest residues, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2, 131, 10.1016/0961-9534(92)90095-8 · DOI
  10. Baral, 2004, Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit, Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 41, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.004 · DOI
  11. Jenkins, 2003, National scale biomass estimators for United States tree species, Forest Science, 49, 12, 10.1093/forestscience/49.1.12 · DOI
  12. Hardy, 2001, Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10, 353, 10.1071/WF01034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jones, G., Loeffler, D., Calkin, D., & Chung, W.
Affiliations
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Greg
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
737-746
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019745774
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Rocky Mountain Research Station
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
forest residues, woody biomass, bioenergy, emissions, CO2 emissions, methane emissions, particulate emissions, energy return, natural gas, distillate oil, western Montana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review