Cited by 48Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

Effect of hyperglycemia on brain and liver 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (FDG SUV) measured by quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging

Open access
Viglianti, Benjamin L., Wong, Ka Kit, Wimer, Stephanie M., Parameswaran, Aishwarya, Nan, Bin, Ky, Christy, Townsend, Danyelle M., Rubello, Domenico +2 more·2017·Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Purpose Blood glucose is routinely measured prior to 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) administration in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to identify hyperglycemia that may affect image quality. In this study we explore the effects of blood glucose levels upon semi-quantitative standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements of target organs and tissues of interest and in particular address the relationship of blood glucose to FDG accumulation in the brain and liver.Methods 436 FDG PET/CT consecutive studies performed for oncology staging in 229 patients (226 male) at the Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Healthcare System were reviewed. All patients had blood glucose measured (112.4±34.1mg/dL) prior to injection of 466.2±51.8MBq (12.6±1.4mCi) of FDG. SUV measurements of brain, aortic arch blood-pool, liver, and spleen were obtained at 64.5±10.2min' post-injection.Results We found a negative inverse relationship of brain SUV with increasing plasma glucose, levels for both absolute and normalized (either to blood-pool or liver) values. Higher blood glucose levels had a mild effect upon liver and blood-pool SUV. By contrast, spleen SUV was independent of blood glucose, but demonstrated the greatest variability (deviation on linear regression). In contrast to other tissues, liver and spleen SUV normalized to blood-pool SUV were not dependent upon blood glucose levels.Conclusion The effects of hyperglycemia upon FDG uptake in brain and liver, over a range of blood glucose values generally considered acceptable for clinical PET imaging, may have measurable effects on semi-quantitative image analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.166

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies suggested that the blood pool is a more optimal and stable reference tissue than the liver, as it is much less dependent than the liver on glycemia and other variables.

    “Several studies suggested that the blood pool is a more optimal and stable reference tissue than the liver,[1,3,25,39,41] as it is much less dependent than the liver on glycemia and other variables.[10]”

    From Intrapatient variability of 18F-FDG uptake in normal tissues (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results and Discussion report that blood-pool SUV had less overall variability than liver SUV, including variability associated with glucose and patient-specific factors. But the Discussion says the glucose effects on blood and liver were not statistically different, so the claim that blood pool is much less dependent on glycemia overstates this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viglianti, B. L., Wong, K. K., Wimer, S. M., Parameswaran, A., Nan, B., Ky, C., Townsend, D. M., Rubello, D., Frey, K. A., & Gross, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Rovigo (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Viglianti, Benjamin L.
  • Rubello, Domenico
Venue
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
88
Pages
1038-1045
ISSN
0753-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587668340
Cited by
48
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Siemens Medical Solutions USA
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002240)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103542)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR024485)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
hyperglycemia, blood glucose, 18F-FDG PET, PET image quality
MeSH terms
Basal Ganglia, Blood Glucose, Brain, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review