The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vocal Acoustic Biomarkers of Depression Severity and Treatment Response
Open accessAbstract
Background Valid, reliable biomarkers of depression severity and treatment response would provide new targets for clinical research. Noticeable differences in speech production between depressed and nondepressed patients have been suggested as a potential biomarker. Methods One hundred and five adults with Major Depression were recruited into a four-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled research methodology study. An exploratory objective of the study was to evaluate the generalizability and repeatability of prior study results indicating vocal acoustic properties in speech may serve as biomarkers for depression severity and response to treatment. Speech samples, collected at baseline and study end-point using an automated telephone system, were analyzed as a function of clinician-rated and patient-reported measures of depression severity and treatment response. Results Regression models of speech pattern changes associated with clinical outcomes in the prior study were found to be reliable and significant predictors of outcome in the current study despite differences in the methodological design and implementation of the two studies. Results of the current study replicate and support findings from the prior study. Clinical changes in depressive symptoms among patients responding to the treatments provided also reflected significant differences in speech production patterns. Depressed patients who did not improve clinically showed smaller vocal acoustic changes and/or changes that were directionally opposite to treatment responders. Conclusions This study supports the feasibility and validity of obtaining clinically important, biologically-based vocal acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response using an automated telephone system. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00406952.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Social Work · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,519
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
Kessler, R. C. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002 · Cited by 12,370
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 8,990
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095 · Cited by 7,988
Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Latshaw, V. V., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2309989 · Cited by 5,072
Wilamowska (2010) · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007 · Cited by 2,115
Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic
Carletta, J. (1996) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9602004 · Cited by 2,088
Cited by
Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety
Huckvale, K., Venkatesh, S., & Christensen, H. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0166-1 · Cited by 433
Automated Depression Diagnosis Based on Deep Networks to Encode Facial Appearance and Dynamics
Zhu, Y., Shang, Y., Shao, Z., & Guo, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2650899 · Cited by 257
Deep learning for depression recognition with audiovisual cues: A review
He, L., Niu, M., Tiwari, P., Marttinen, P., Su, R., Jiang, J., Guo, C., Wang, H., Ding, S., Wang, Z., et al. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.10.012 · Cited by 253
Smartphone data as an electronic biomarker of illness activity in bipolar disorder
Faurholt‐Jepsen, M., Vinberg, M., Frost, M., Christensen, E. M., Bardram, J. E., & Kessing, L. V. (2015) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12332 · Cited by 169
Burton, C., Szentagotai Tatar, A., McKinstry, B., Matheson, C., Matu, S., Moldovan, R., Macnab, M., Farrow, E., David, D., Pagliari, C., et al. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x15609793 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Mundt, J. C., Vogel, A. P., Feltner, D. E., & Lenderking, W. R.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 580-587
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071268704
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocal Acoustic Biomarkers of Depression Severity and Treatment Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.015
- The paper
- Mundt, J. C., Vogel, A. P., Feltner, D. E., & Lenderking, W. R. (2012). Vocal Acoustic Biomarkers of Depression Severity and Treatment Response. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.