Cited by 15Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Improving Research Standards to Restore Trust in Intranasal Oxytocin

Carson, Dean S., Yuan, Hsiangkuo, Labuschagne, Izelle·2016·Biological Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.031

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carson, D. S., Yuan, H., & Labuschagne, I.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Carson, Dean S.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
79
Issue
8
Pages
e53-e54
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2217106447
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, research standards, research quality, intranasal drug delivery, animal studies, research reproducibility
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Oxytocin, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review