Cited by 54Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

How Can Intranasal Oxytocin Research Be Trusted? A Systematic Review of the Interactive Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin on Psychosocial Outcomes

Open access
Mierop, A., Mikolajczak, M., Stahl, C., Béna, J., Luminet, O., Lane, A., Corneille, O.·2020·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Over the past two decades, research about the role of oxytocin (OT) in human behavior has grown exponentially. However, a unified theory of OT effects has yet to be developed. Relatedly, growing concerns about the robustness of conclusions drawn in the field have been raised. The current article contributes to this debate by reporting on and discussing key conclusions from a systematic review of published studies addressing the interactive effects of intranasal OT (IN-OT) administration on psychosocial outcomes in a healthy population. The review indicates that (a) tested interactive IN-OT effects were highly heterogeneous; (b) for most published interactions, no replication was attempted; (c) when attempted, replications were largely unsuccessful; (d) significance was unrelated to sample size; (e) statistical power was critically low and unrelated to the rate of significant results; and (f) research practices were characteristic of an exploratory approach. This concerning state of affairs makes it virtually impossible to tease apart true from false interactive IN-OT effects. We provide constructive directions on the basis of this observation and positive predictive value simulations for future research that should help extract true effects from noise and move the IN-OT field forward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691620921525

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranasal oxytocin's effects on both social and addictive behaviors in clinical studies are inconsistent and impacted by various methodological differences.

    “intranasal oxytocin's effects on both social and addictive behaviors in clinical studies are inconsistent and impacted by various methodological differences emerging in this rapidly proliferating literature.”
  • Factors such as small sample sizes, underpowered and exploratory designs, measurement inconsistencies in laboratory versus naturalistic trials, and wide variability in dosing potency and strategy have shaped the complexity of the clinical oxytocin literature.

    “Factors such as small sample sizes, underpowered and exploratory designs, measurement inconsistencies in laboratory versus naturalistic trials, and wide variability in dosing potency and strategy have all shaped the complexity of the clinical oxytocin literature to date13–15.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mierop, A., Mikolajczak, M., Stahl, C., Béna, J., Luminet, O., Lane, A., & Corneille, O.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
Corresponding author
Mierop, A.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2020-07-07
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
1228-1242
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W3039842734
Cited by
53
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, interaction effects, psychosocial outcomes, research reproducibility, replication failure, statistical power, sample size, positive predictive value, healthy population
MeSH terms
Social Cognition, Psychosocial Functioning, Administration, Intranasal, Humans, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review