Clinical advances from a computational approach to anxiety
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advances in mental health research necessarily rely on characterizing underlying neurobiological mechanisms of pathophysiology, and psychiatry may be fundamentally limited as long as assessments are limited to observable phenomena.
“This suggests that advances in mental health research necessarily rely on characterizing underlying neurobiological mechanisms of pathophysiology, and that psychiatry may be fundamentally limited as long as assessments are limited to observable phenomena (Pine, 2017).”
From Investigating functional brain network integrity using a traditional and novel categorical scheme for neurodevelopmental disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Pine, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20087 · Cited by 1,377 · see citing works
Using Neuroscience to Help Understand Fear and Anxiety: A Two-System Framework
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications
Huys, Q. J. M., Maia, T. V., & Frank, M. J. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4238 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Duits, P., Cath, D. C., Lissek, S., Hox, J. J., Hamm, A. O., Engelhard, I. M., van den Hout, M. A., & Baas, J. M. P. (2015) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22353 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory
Redish, A. D. (1999) · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Differential roles of human striatum and amygdala in associative learning
Li, J., Schiller, D., Schoenbaum, G. M., Phelps, E. A., & Daw, N. D. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2904 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior
Bollen, K. A., & Noble, M. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010661108 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Reinforcement learning, conditioning, and the brain: Successes and challenges
Maia, T. V. (2009) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.9.4.343 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Response to Learned Threat: An fMRI Study in Adolescent and Adult Anxiety
Britton, J. C., Grillon, C., Lissek, S. M., Norcross, M. A., Szuhany, K. L., Chen, G., Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., Leibenluft, E., Shechner, T., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12050651 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Meurs, B., Wiggert, N., Wicker, I., & Lissek, S. M. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.03.009 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lonsdorf, T. B., & Merz, C. J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.007 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Price, R. B., Brown, V., & Siegle, G. J. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Modeling anxiety in healthy humans: a key intermediate bridge between basic and clinical sciences
Grillon, C., Robinson, O. J., Cornwell, B., & Ernst, M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0445-1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Theory-Based Computational Psychiatry
Maia, T. V., Huys, Q. J. M., & Frank, M. J. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.016 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Brown, V. M., Price, R. B., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2023) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-023-01080-w · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Dajani, D. R., Burrows, C. A., Odriozola, P., Baez, A., Nebel, M. B., Mostofsky, S. H., & Uddin, L. Q. (2019) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101678 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“This suggests that advances in mental health research necessarily rely on characterizing underlying neurobiological mechanisms of pathophysiology, and that psychiatry may be fundamentally limited as long as assessments are limited to observable phenomena (Pine, 2017).”
Luby, J. L., Allen, N. B., Estabrook, R., Pine, D. S., Rogers, C. E., Krogh‐Jespersen, S., Norton, E. S., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103484 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationPessimistically biased perception in panic disorder during risk learning
Kim, M., Kim, S., Lee, K., & Jeong, B. (2020) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23007 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Out of control: computational dynamic control dysfunction in stress- and anxiety-related disorders
Howlett, J. R., & Paulus, M. P. (2024) · Discover Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s44192-023-00058-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mathematical Characterization of Changes in Fear During Exposure Therapy
Portêlo, A., Shiban, Y., & Maia, T. V. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.01.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Howlett, J. R., Thompson, W. K., & Paulus, M. P. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.12.011 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Limongi, R., Skelton, A. J., Tzianas, L. H., & Silva, A. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14121278 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Salum, G. A. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.12.017 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Young, J. H. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119767398.furread
- Authors
- Pine, D. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pine, Daniel S.
- ORCID
- Pine, Daniel S.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 385-387
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6346215
- OpenAlex
- W2555670341
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- National Institutes of Health (ZIA‐MH002781)
- National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002781, ZIAMH002782)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- anxiety, computational psychiatry, dimensional assessment, Research Domain Criteria, psychopathology, clinical evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Research Design, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
