Cited by 78Reproductive Health and ContraceptionEstrogen and related hormone effectsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Natural and synthetic sex hormones: Effects on higher-order cognitive function and prepulse inhibition

Gogos, Andrea·2013·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Little is known about the effects of the commonly-used oral contraceptive pill (OC) on cognition. This study compared matched healthy women across the menstrual cycle (early-follicular 'Low E/P', mid-luteal 'High E/P'), women using the combined OC, and men. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was used to assess immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial ability, language and attention. Assessment of prepulse inhibition (PPI) included 21 pulse-alone trials (115dB) and 42 prepulse-pulse trials (74, 78, 86dB). The OC and High E/P groups outperformed men on the total RBANS score, an overall measure of cognition. For the immediate memory/learning and attention domains, the OC group outperformed men; for the delayed memory domain, the OC and High E/P groups outperformed men. In conclusion, high levels of natural or synthetic sex hormones had a positive effect on higher-order cognition but had little effect on baseline PPI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher estradiol and progesterone are generally associated with better executive function and attention.

    “Higher estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) have been generally linked to enhanced executive function (EF) and attention (e.g., Hatta & Nagaya, 2009), which appear to improve during cycle phases characterized by elevated E2 and P4 (Gogos, 2013; Howard et al., 1988; Jacobs & D’Esposito, 2011; Lord & Taylor, 1991; Rosenberg & Park, 2002; Segal, 2012; Vranic´ & Hromatko, 2008; Solís-Ortiz & Corsi-Cab”

    From Reproductive steroids and ADHD symptoms across the menstrual cycle (2018) · cites this paper as Gogos, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gogos, A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Gogos, Andrea
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016185968
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
oral contraceptives, sex hormones, prepulse inhibition, cognitive function, menstrual cycle, estradiol, progesterone, sex differences, memory, attention, visuospatial ability, language
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Cross-Sectional Studies, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Memory, Menstrual Cycle, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review