Cited by 46Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Does stroke volume influence heartbeat evoked responses?

Open access
Buot, Anne, Azzalini, Damiano, Chaumon, Maximilien, Tallon-Baudry, Catherine·2021·Biological Psychology

Abstract

We know surprisingly little on how heartbeat-evoked responses (HERs) vary with cardiac parameters. Here, we measured both stroke volume, or volume of blood ejected at each heartbeat, with impedance cardiography, and HER amplitude with magneto-encephalography, in 21 male and female participants at rest with eyes open. We observed that HER co-fluctuates with stroke volume on a beat-to-beat basis, but only when no correction for cardiac artifact was performed. This highlights the importance of an ICA correction tailored to the cardiac artifact. We also observed that easy-to-measure cardiac parameters (interbeat intervals, ECG amplitude) are sensitive to stroke volume fluctuations and can be used as proxies when stroke volume measurements are not available. Finally, interindividual differences in stroke volume were reflected in MEG data, but whether this effect is locked to heartbeats is unclear. Altogether, our results question assumptions on the link between stroke volume and HERs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108165

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac parameters themselves such as heart rate or stroke volume seem to have only a limited influence on HERs' variability.

    “So far, cardiac parameters themselves such as heart rate or stroke volume seem to have only a limited influence on HERs' variability 79-81 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buot, A., Azzalini, D., Chaumon, M., & Tallon-Baudry, C.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Buot, Anne
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
165
Pages
108165
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196236258
Cited by
46
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • European Research Council
  • Agence nationale de la recherche
  • École des Neurosciences de Paris Île-de-France
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
stroke volume, independent component analysis, magnetoencephalography, impedance cardiography, RR interval, individual differences, cardiac parameters
MeSH terms
Cardiac Output, Cardiography, Impedance, Female, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Stroke Volume

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review