Effect of feeding food waste-broiler litter and bakery by-product mixture to pigs
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding aerobically processed and vacuum-dried food waste-broiler litter and bakery by-product mixture to finishing pigs on performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and taste panel test. A corn-soy diet (Control) was replaced with food waste mixture (FWM) at dietary levels of 25% (25% FWM) and 50% (50% FWM) on a dry matter (DM) basis. Diets were fed to a total of 45 pigs (mean body weight 69.4kg) during the eight wk of finishing period. After slaughtering, longissmus muscle at 24h postmortem was used for meat quality analysis. Restaurant food waste was high in protein (22.0%) and fat (23.9%). Supplementing a corn-soy diet with FWM increased (P<0.05) feed DM intake, did not alter (P>0.05) average daily gain, decreased (P<0.05) feed efficiency especially for 50% FWM treatment, and substantially reduced (P<0.05) feed cost, compared with feeding a corn-soy diet only. Feeding FWM up to 50% did not affect (P>0.05) carcass characteristics (carcass weight, dressing percentage, backfat thickness and carcass grade), meat fatty acid composition, meat quality (marbling score, pH, water holding capacity, drip loss, L*, a*, b* values, Warner-Bratzler shear force, cooking loss), and taste panel test (flavor, taste, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptance) compared with feeding a corn-soy diet. However, meat color was paler (P<0.05) for 50% FWM fed animals than a corn-soy diet fed animals. Meat color was the only limiting factor when FWM was fed to finishing pigs. In conclusion, aerobically processed and vacuum-dried food waste-broiler litter and bakery by-product mixture was similar to a corn-soy diet in feed value for finishing pigs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microbial processing and vacuum-drying, or a combination, can reduce moisture content while preventing nutrient loss.
“Another method of reducing the moisture content is microbial processing. Vacuum-drying is used to prevent nutrient loss while reducing moisture. A combination of both methods has also been suggested [123].”
From Potential Valorization of Banana Production Waste in Developing Countries: Bio-Engineering Aspects (2024) · cites this paper as [123]
Cites
Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis1
Noblet, J., & PÉREZ, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1993.71123389x · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Westendorf, M. L., Dong, Z., & Schoknecht, P. A. (1998) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1998.76122976x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Evaluation of dehydrated restaurant food waste products as feedstuffs for finishing pigs.
Myer, R. O., Brendemuhl, J. H., & Johnson, D. D. (1999) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1999.773685x · Cited by 97 · see citing works
(2000) · doi:10.1002/9780470290217 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Food Waste as Animal Feed: an Introduction
Westendorf, M. L. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9780470290217.ch1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
MacNichol, E. F. (1964) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1264-48 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Effects of Feeding Dried Food Waste on Growth and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-Finishing Pigs
Chae, B. J., Choi, S.-G., Kim, Y. G., Kim, C., & Sohn, K. S. (2000) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2000.1304 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Food Residuals: Waste Product, By‐Product, or Coproduct
Walker, P. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9780470290217.ch2 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Swine Feeding Experiments with Cooked Residential Garbage
Heitman, H., Perry, C. A., & Gamboa, L. K. (1956) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1956.1541072x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Nam, B. S., Chung, I. B., Kim, Y. H., Moon, H., Kim, D. H., Hur, S., Bae, I.-S., & Yang, C. J. (2000) · Korean Journal of Animal Science · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kwak, W. S. (2003) · Journal of Animal Science and Technology · doi:10.5187/jast.2003.45.1.087 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationKwak, W. S., Kang, J. S., & Chung, J. D. (2002) · Journal of Animal Environmental Science · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Food waste for livestock feeding: Feasibility, safety, and sustainability implications
Dou, Z., Toth, J. D., & Westendorf, M. L. (2018) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2017.12.003 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Reducing the land use of EU pork production: Where there’s swill, there’s a way
zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J., Phalan, B., Green, R. E., & Balmford, A. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Čolović, D., Rakita, S., Banjac, V., Đuragić, O., & Čabarkapa, I. (2019) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2019.1573431 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Potential Valorization of Banana Production Waste in Developing Countries: Bio-Engineering Aspects
Waraczewski, R., & Sołowiej, B. G. (2024) · Fibers · doi:10.3390/fib12090072 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“A combination of both methods has also been suggested [123].”
- Authors
- Kwak, W. S., & Kang, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Konkuk University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kwak, W.S.
- ORCID
- Kwak, W.S.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-249
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170548788
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- food waste, broiler litter, bakery by-products, fattening pigs, pig feed, meat quality, meat color, feed efficiency, carcass characteristics, meat fatty acid composition, vacuum drying, sensory evaluation, feed cost
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Diet, Food, Food Handling, Meat, Refuse Disposal, Swine, Waste Products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review