The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the efficacy of a bacterial consortium for the removal of color, reduction of heavy metals, and toxicity from textile dye effluent
Abstract
A microbial consortium DAS consisting three bacterial sp. originally obtained from dye contaminated sites of Solapur, India was selected because it was capable of decolorizing textile effluent and dye faster than the individual bacteria under static conditions. Identification of the isolates by 16S rRNA techniques revealed the isolates to be Pseudomonas species. The concerted metabolic activity of these isolates led to complete decolorization of textile effluent as well as Reactive Orange 16 (100 mg l(-1)) within 48-h at pH 7 and 30 degrees C. Studies involving Reactive Orange 16 (RO16) dye were carried with the bacterial consortium DAS to elucidate the mechanism of biodegradation. Induction of the laccase and reductase enzyme during RO16 decolorization indicated their role in biodegradation. The biodegradation of RO16 was monitored by using IR spectroscopy, HPLC and GC-MS analysis. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and phytotoxicity studies carried out before and after decolorization of the textile effluent revealed the nontoxic nature of the biotreated sample.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bacteria can be employed for dye decolorization, resulting in a 30% reduction in effluent toxicity.
“Bacteria can be employed to remove dye decolorization in specific cases, resulting in a 30% reduction in effluent toxicity [200,201].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [200]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Application of polyaniline-based adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater—a review
Nasar, A., & Mashkoor, F. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3990-y · Cited by 341
Oyetade, J. A., Machunda, R. L., & Hilonga, A. (2022) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01305 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Jadhav, J. P., Kalyani, D. C., Telke, A. A., Phugare, S. S., & Govindwar, S. P.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-173
- ISSN
- 0960-8524
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review