Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biological treatment of a dye solution by Macroalgae Chara sp.: Effect of operational parameters, intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling

Khataee, A.R., Dehghan, G., Ebadi, A., Zarei, M., Pourhassan, M.·2010·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The potential of a macroalgae Chara sp. was investigated as a viable biomaterial for biological treatment of Malachite Green (MG) solution. The effects of operational parameters such as temperature, pH, initial dye concentration, reaction time and amount of algae on biological decolorization efficiency were studied. Biological treatment of MG solution by live and dead algae was compared. The reusability and efficiency of the live algae in long-term repetitive operations were also examined. The batch experiments results revealed the ability of algal species in biological degradation of the dye. The biological degradation compounds formed in this process were analyzed by UV-Vis, FT-IR and GC-Mass techniques. The degradation pathway of MG was proposed based on the identified compounds. In addition, an artificial neural network model was developed to predict the biological degradation efficiency. The findings indicated that ANN provides reasonable predictive performance (R(2)=0.970). The influence of each parameter on the variable studied was assessed, reaction time being the most significant factor, followed by temperature of the solution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.079

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khataee, A. R., Dehghan, G., Ebadi, A., Zarei, M., & Pourhassan, M.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
2252-2258
ISSN
0960-8524
Cited by
170
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review