Cited by 248Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesBiofuel production and bioconversionFood Drying and Modeling

Effect of thermal pretreatment on equilibrium moisture content of lignocellulosic biomass

Acharjee, Tapas C., Coronella, Charles J., Vasquez, Victor R.·2011·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The equilibrium moisture content (EMC) of raw lignocellulosic biomass, along with four samples subjected to thermal pretreatment, was measured at relative humidities ranging from 11% to 97% at a constant temperature of 30 °C. Three samples were prepared by treatment in hot compressed water by a process known as wet torrefaction, at temperatures of 200, 230, and 260 °C. An additional sample was prepared by dry torrefaction at 300 °C. Pretreated biomass shows EMC below that of raw biomass. This indicates that pretreated biomass, both dry and wet torrefied, is more hydrophobic than raw biomass. The EMC results were correlated with a recent model that takes into account additional non-adsorption interactions of water, such as mixing and swelling. The model offers physical insight into the water activity in lignocellulosic biomass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of hemicellulose from hydrochar during HTC lowers its tendency to adsorb water and makes it a hydrophobic product.

    “During the first of hemicellulose from the hydrochar during HTC lowers its tendency to adsorb water and makes it a hydrophobic product [26].”
  • The equilibrium moisture content depends on the chemical composition and functional groups of biomass.

    “The equilibrium moisture content also depends on the chemical composition and functional groups of biomass (Acharjee et al., 2011).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Acharjee et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acharjee, T. C., Coronella, C. J., & Vasquez, V. R.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Coronella, Charles J.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
102
Issue
7
Pages
4849-4854
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969125088
Cited by
248
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
13.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Energy (DE-FG36-01GO11082)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
Keywords
equilibrium moisture content, lignocellulosic biomass, thermal pretreatment, torrefaction, wet torrefaction, dry torrefaction, water activity, hydrophobicity, relative humidity
MeSH terms
Hot Temperature, Humidity, Lignin, Models, Chemical, Water, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review