Cited by 186Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural and Food Sciences

Pelletization of biochar from hydrothermally carbonized wood

Reza, M. Toufiq, Lynam, Joan G., Vasquez, Victor R., Coronella, Charles J.·2012·Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy

Abstract

Abstract Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a pretreatment process for making a homogenized, carbon rich, and energy dense solid fuel, called biochar, from underutilized lignocellulosic biomass. Compared to raw biomass, HTC biochar is both more hydrophobic for better storage and more friable for better processing. In this pretreatment method, the biomass is treated with hot compressed water in the temperature range of 200–260°C. Hemicelluloses and water extractives react very quickly compared to cellulose. Lignin is relatively inert, resulting in a biochar with increased lignin content. Lignin acts as a binder for pelletization of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. A hydraulic press with a controllable heated die was used for pelletization studies. The materials used to make pellets were raw loblolly pine and pine pretreated at different temperatures. The presence of solid bridges was observed in both raw pine pellets and HTC biochar pellets. Pellets made from HTC biochar exhibit favorable properties, including increased hydrophobicity, abrasion resistance, energy density, and mass density compared to pellets produced from raw pine or from dry torrefied pine. Pellets produced from biomass pretreated at 260°C have a volumetric fuel value 70% greater than pellets produced from untreated pine (38.8 MJ/m 3 vs. 22.8 GJ/m 3 ), a mass density of 1468 kg/m 3 , and a higher heating value of 26.4 MJ/kg. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2012

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ep.11615

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to increase in lignin or decrease in hemicellulose content, hydrophobicity of HTC residue increases, thereby shelf life of HTC residue would be increased without any biodegradation.

    “Due to the increase in the lignin or decrease in the hemicellulose content, the hydrophobicity of the HTC residue increases, thereby the shelf life of the HTC residue would be increased without any biodegradation [85,107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reza, M. T., Lynam, J. G., Vasquez, V. R., & Coronella, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Coronella, Charles J.
Venue
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-29
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
225-234
ISSN
  • 1944-7442 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7450
OpenAlex
W2039176038
Cited by
186
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Desert Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
Keywords
hydrothermal carbonization, biochar, pelletization, lignocellulosic biomass, Pinus taeda, torrefaction, lignin, hydrophobicity, energy density, solid fuels, hydraulic pressing, biomass pretreatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review