Cited by 36Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionBiofuel production and bioconversionRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Methane yield through anaerobic digestion for various maize varieties in China

Gao, Ruifang, Yuan, Xufeng, Zhu, Wanbin, Wang, Xiaofen, Chen, Shaojiang, Cheng, Xu, Cui, Zongjun·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The methane potential of nine varieties of fresh maize harvested at three different times and of maize silage was experimentally determined in batch assays. The ultimate methane productivity in terms of volatile solids (VS) was determined as 213.94-313.63, 195.88-334.81 mL/g VS from several fresh and silage maize in three stages, respectively. The average specific methane yield of wax ripeness stage for fresh maize and full ripeness stage for silage maize were higher than that of other stages, respectively. The high-oil varieties of fresh maize and silage varieties of ensiling maize could produce more methane than general varieties in the same ripeness stage. Methane yield of ensiled materials was higher than fresh material. The methane yields of fresh and silage maize in full ripeness stage were ranged 5656-7956 and 4633-8915 m(3)/ha, respectively. The corresponding maximum of methane yield came from fresh HO5580 and silage CAU No. 4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.051

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An enhancing effect of silage fermentation on methane yields based on ODM added to the anaerobic digestion process as compared with methane yields of biomass prior to ensiling is in accordance with findings in literature.

    “An enhancing effect of silage fermentation on methane yields based on ODM added to the anaerobic digestion process as compared with methane yields of biomass prior to ensiling is in accordance with findings in literature (e.g.Gao et al., 2012;Herrmann et al., 2014;Kafle and Kim, 2013) and was discussed in detail previously (Herrmann et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, R., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Wang, X., Chen, S., Cheng, X., & Cui, Z.
Affiliations
China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cui, Zongjun
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
118
Pages
611-614
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053552952
Cited by
36
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011BAD15B01, 2008BADC4B01)
  • Rural Biogas Technology supporting Project of China (2010-124)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, methane yield, maize varieties, corn silage, volatile solids, high-oil maize, silage fermentation, biogas
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Biotechnology, China, Zea mays, Methane, Silage, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review