Cited by 119Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionBioenergy crop production and managementCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity

Schittenhelm, Siegfried·2008·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most important substrate for biogas production in Germany. This study was conducted to determine the influence of harvest date and hybrid maturity on the yield and quality of maize biomass for anaerobic methane production. In 2004 and 2005, maize hybrids of widely contrasting maturity were grown on a loamy sand soil (Haplic Luvisol) near Braunschweig, Germany. Whole-plant yield was determined several times after female flowering and the biomass analysed for nutrient composition. The specific methane yield (SMY) was measured using 20l batch digesters. In both experimental years, the late energy maize prototypes had a lower concentration of fat and protein, but higher concentration of ash, detergent fibre, and lignin as compared with the climatically adapted medium-early hybrids. Despite substantially different nutrient concentration among the maize hybrids, no clear-cut association existed between chemical composition and specific methane yield. Contrary to the medium-early hybrids, the late hybrids attained both maximum specific methane yield and maximum methane hectare yields at the final harvest date. In the very long growing season of 2004, the highest individual methane yield of 9370Nm³ ha⁻¹ was obtained by the hybrid with the latest maturity used in the study. It appears that late energy maize, which can take full advantage of the growing season, is better suited for biogas production, provided that the whole-plant dry matter concentration is high enough to produce good quality silage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2008.04.001

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schittenhelm, S.
Affiliations
Julius Kühn-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Schittenhelm, Siegfried
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
29
Issue
2-3
Pages
72-79
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005747019
Cited by
119
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
maize hybrids, hybrid maturity, biogas production, anaerobic digestion, methane yield, biomass composition, harvest time, lignin, protein and fat content, Haplic Luvisol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review