Cited by 76

Enhancement of cell biomass and cell activity of astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis

Sun, Han, Kong, Qing, Geng, Zhaoyan, Duan, Liangfei, Yang, Min, Guan, Bin·2015·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Fed-batch culture and the transformation conditions of Haematococcus pluvialis in a 5L photobioreactor were investigated. Methods of feeding model, low temperature at night and proper feeding time were used to increase both cell biomass and cell activity. Dry cell weight of 1.87 g/L which was 2.0-fold of batch culture and the specific growth rate of 0.43 d(-1) suggested the superduper results of these methods to increase the dry cell weight in the short cultivation time. Furthermore, mixed lights of blue and white (ratio of 3:1) at 7000 xl were used to expedite the morphologic changes of H. pluvialis from green cells to red cyst cells with the yield of 91.8±2.53 mg/L.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Kong, Q., Geng, Z., Duan, L., Yang, M., & Guan, B.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
186
Pages
67-73
ISSN
0960-8524
Cited by
76
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2010CM050)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471657)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review