The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae – A comparison
Open accessAbstract
Resource recovery, preferably as high value products, is becoming an integral part of modern wastewater treatment, with conversion to heterotrophic or phototrophic/photosynthetic microbes a key option to minimise dissipation, and maximise recovery. This study compares the treatment capacities of purple phototrophic bacteria (PPB) and microalgae of five agri-industrial wastewaters (pork, poultry, red meat, dairy and sugar) to recover carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous as a microbial product. The mediators have different advantages, with PPB offering moderate removals (up to 74% COD, 80% NH 4 -N, 55% PO 4 -P) but higher yields (>0.75 gCOD removed gCOD added −1 ) and a more consistent, PPB dominated (>50%) product, with a higher crude protein product (>0.6 gCP gVSS −1 ). The microalgae tests achieved a better removal outcome (up to 91%COD, 91% NH 4 -N, 73%PO 4 -P), but with poorer quality product, and <30% abundance as algae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jorquera, O., Kiperstok, A., Sales, E. A., Embiruçu, M., & Ghirardi, M. L. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.038 · Cited by 863
Design principles of photo-bioreactors for cultivation of microalgae
Posten, C. (2009) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.200900003 · Cited by 815
Microalgae in Human and Animal Nutrition
Becker, W. (2003) · Handbook of Microalgal Culture · doi:10.1002/9780470995280.ch18 · Cited by 613
Wang, C., Zuo, J., Chen, X., Xing, W., Xing, L., Li, P., Lu, X., & Li, C. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.035 · Cited by 47
Suwan, D., Chitapornpan, S., Honda, R., Chiemchaisri, W., & Chiemchaisri, C. (2014) · Environmental Engineering Research · doi:10.4491/eer.2014.s1.009 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review
Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243 · Cited by 874
Recent advances in single cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture
Jones, S. W., Karpol, A., Friedman, S., Maru, B. T., & Tracy, B. P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.026 · Cited by 353
Purple phototrophic bacteria for resource recovery: Challenges and opportunities
Capson-Tojo, G., Batstone, D. J., Grassino, M., Vlaeminck, S. E., Puyol, D., Verstraete, W., Kleerebezem, R., Oehmen, A., Ghimire, A., Pikaar, I., et al. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107567 · Cited by 228
Self-citationChen, C.-Y., Lu, J.-C., Chang, Y.-H., Chen, J.-H., Nagarajan, D., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128538 · Cited by 47
Singh, V., & Mishra, V. (2021) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2021.108129 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hülsen, T., Hsieh, K., Lu, Y., Tait, S., & Batstone, D. J.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 254
- Pages
- 214-223
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792138436
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae – A comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.032
- The paper
- Hülsen, T., Hsieh, K., Lu, Y., Tait, S., & Batstone, D. J. (2018). Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae – A comparison. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
