Cited by 42Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesAlgal biology and biofuel production

Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Gracilaria corticata macroalgae: Effects of process parameter on bio-oil up-gradation

Li, Yunlin, Zhu, Chaosheng, Jiang, Jing, Yang, Zhiguang, Feng, Wenli, Li, Lili, Guo, Yifei, Hu, Jianli·2021·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of Gracilaria corticata (GC) macroalgae was studied over a series of nickel-iron-layered double oxides (NiFe-LDO) supported on activated bio-char catalysts at 280 °C and different solvents medium. Maximum bio-oil yield (56.2 wt%) was found with 5%Ga/NiFe-LDO/AC catalyst at 280 °C under ethanol solvent. The catalytic HTL up-gradation decreased the bio-char yield significantly. However the bio-oil quality significantly improved with using the 5%Ga/NiFe-LDO/AC catalyst. Also, improved performance with higher amount of bio-oil and lower amounts of bio-char and gas were achieved, which is due the several reactions happening during the HTL process. Catalytic HTL also revealed that introducing NiFe-LDO nanosheets into the activated char could result in NiFe-LDO/AC catalysts of higher surface area and increased active sites. Being impregnated by 5%Ga, catalysts with improved acid sites and thereby, advanced deoxygenation and aromatization activities were achieved. Hence Ga/NiFe-LDO/AC could be considered as a promising catalyst HTL bio-oil upgrading.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124163

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Zhu, C., Jiang, J., Yang, Z., Feng, W., Li, L., Guo, Y., & Hu, J.
Affiliations
  • Zhoukou Normal University (CN)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Lili
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
319
Pages
124163
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089137087
Cited by
42
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21477167, 21806194, 31902419)
  • Science and Technology Research Plan Program of Henan Province (172102310712, 182102311110, 192102110084)
  • Natural Science Research Program Foundation of High Education Schools of Henan Province (17B610009, 15A520114, CJSZ2018004)
  • Opening Project of Henan Province Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Rehabilitation Technology (ZKNU2014118)
  • Doctoral Program of Zhoukou Normal University
  • School-Based Program of Zhoukou Normal University (zknu B2201606, zknu B3201715, zknuB315213)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
Keywords
catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction, Gracilaria corticata, seaweed, bio-oil upgrading, activated carbon support, ethanol solvent, deoxygenation, aromatization, acid sites, nanosheets
MeSH terms
Plant Oils, Seaweed, Temperature, Water, Biomass, Gracilaria, Biofuels, Polyphenols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review