Cited by 15

Artificial neural networks prediction and optimization based on four light regions for light utilization from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

Yu, Tao, Fan, Fei, Huang, Lei, Wang, Weiliang, Wan, Minxi, Li, Yuanguang·2024·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Light is crucial in microalgae growth. However, dividing the microalgae growth region into light and dark regions has limitations. In this study, the light response of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 was investigated to define four light regions (FLRs): light compensation region, light limitation region, light saturation region, and photoinhibition region. The proportions of cells' residence time in the FLRs and the number of times cells (NTC) passed through the FLRs in photobioreactors were calculated by using MATLAB. Based on the FLRs and NTC passed through the FLRs, a growth model was established by using artificial neural network (ANN).The ANN model had a validation R 2 value of 0.97, which was 76.36% higher than the model based on light-dark regions. The high accuracy of the ANN model was further verified through dynamic adjustment of light intensity experiments.This study confirmed the importance of the FLRs for studying microalgae growth dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130166

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yu, T., Fan, F., Huang, L., Wang, W., Wan, M., & Li, Y.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
394
Pages
130166
ISSN
0960-8524
Cited by
15
References
7
Language
en
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31372548)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review