Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 757

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 diagnosis —A review of current methods

Open access
Yüce, Meral, Filiztekin, Elif, Özkaya, Korin Gasia·2021·Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Abstract

A fast and accurate self-testing tool for COVID-19 diagnosis has become a prerequisite to comprehend the exact number of cases worldwide and to take medical and governmental actions accordingly. SARS-CoV-2 (formerly, 2019-nCoV) infection was first reported in Wuhan (China) in December 2019, and then it has rapidly spread around the world, causing ~ 14 million active cases with ~ 582,000 deaths as of July 2020. The diagnosis tools available so far have been based on a) viral gene detection, b) human antibody detection, and c) viral antigen detection, among which the viral gene detection by RT-PCR has been found as the most reliable technique. In this report, the current SARS-CoV-2 detection kits, exclusively the ones that were issued an “Emergency Use Authorization” from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, were discussed. The key structural components of the virus were presented to provide the audience with an understanding of the scientific principles behind the testing tools. The methods that are still in the early research state were also reviewed in a subsection based on the reports available so far.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112752

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Chen, 2019, Ultratrace antibiotic sensing using aptamer/graphene-based field-effect transistors, Biosens. Bioelectron., 126, 664, 10.1016/j.bios.2018.11.034 · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.11.034
  2. Cohen, 2020, Unprecedented nationwide blood studies seek to track U.S. coronavirus spread, Science (80-. )
  3. Kurt, 2019, Plasmonic Selection of ssDNA Aptamers against fibroblast growth factor Receptor, ACS Comb. Sci., 21, 578, 10.1021/acscombsci.9b00059 · doi:10.1021/acscombsci.9b00059
  4. Lee, 2001, Identification and subtyping of avian influenza viruses by reverse transcription-PCR, J. Virol. Methods, 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00301-9 · doi:10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00301-9
  5. NA [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC102748/(accessed 4.28.20).
  6. Maghdid, 2020, A Novel AI-enabled Framework to Diagnose Coronavirus COVID 19 using Smartphone Embedded Sensors, Des. Stud., 1–5
  7. Maxmen, 2020, The researchers taking a gamble with antibody tests for coronavirus, Nature, 10.1038/d41586-020-01163-5 · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01163-5
  8. Okba, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients, Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020
  9. Pabbaraju, 2009, Design and validation of real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, J. Clin. Microbiol., 10.1128/JCM.01103-09 · doi:10.1128/jcm.01103-09
  10. Worldometer, 2020, Coronavirus update (live): Cases and deaths from COVID-19 virus pandemic, Worldometers

Cited by

See all 757

Metadata

Authors
Yüce, M., Filiztekin, E., & Özkaya, K. G.
Venue
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
172
Pages
112752
ISSN
0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094064847
Cited by
757
References
48
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COVID-19 diagnosis —A review of current methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112752
The paper
Yüce, M., Filiztekin, E., & Özkaya, K. G. (2021). COVID-19 diagnosis —A review of current methods. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112752

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.