Cited by 43Smart Agriculture and AIEngineering and Agricultural InnovationsArduino and IoT Applications

Low-cost Edge Computing devices and novel user interfaces for monitoring pivot irrigation systems based on Internet of Things and LoRaWAN technologies

Open access
Mateos Matilla, Diego, Lozano Murciego, Álvaro, Jiménez-Bravo, Diego M., Sales Mendes, André, Leithardt, Valderi R.Q.·2022·Biosystems Engineering

Abstract

The increase in irrigated crop areas, especially in countries such as Spain and Italy, has led to an increase in technological solutions for monitoring the irrigation. Furthermore, the centre pivot irrigation systems used in these crops have facilitated the daily work of farmers in recent years, however, the monitoring of these systems and the reporting of problems in their operation has become a key aspect during the growing season. For this reason, different monitoring solutions have been proposed from the area of Precision Agriculture and Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). Nevertheless, it is necessary that these solutions take into account the digital divide their potential users may suffer and be low-cost solutions in order to be attractive to the end-users. This paper presents several low-cost solutions using novel user interfaces and wireless communication technologies for the monitoring of this type of irrigation systems. This paper presents the results obtained after the deployment of the proposed systems on a real environment and the main conclusions drawn after their use in irrigated maize crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.07.010

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model in [126] scored an accuracy of 97% on validation sets, and 96% on test set, with 151 trainable parameters.

    “The model scored an accuracy of 97% on the validation sets, and 96% on test set, with a number of 151 trainable parameters.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [126]

    Section 5.3 reports accuracy of 88.1% for the normal model and 88% for the microcontroller model, contrary to the claimed 96% test accuracy. Section 4.3.1 identifies a validation split but does not report 97% validation accuracy or 151 trainable parameters. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Authors in [126] developed a multi-label TinyML model based on MLP architecture for micro-climate control of a strawberry agricultural greenhouse.

    “The authors in [126] developed a multi-label TinyML model based on Multi-Layer Perceptron(MLP) architecture for micro-climate control of a strawberry agricultural greenhouse.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [126]

    Section 4.3.1 describes a microcontroller model for reading numerical water meters, not for controlling the micro-climate of a strawberry greenhouse. It says AutoKeras was used to find the network architecture; it does not identify the model as an MLP. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. y Leon (Operational Programme 2014e2020 for Castilla y Le on, EDU/574/2018 BOCYL). The research of Andr e Filipe Sales Mendes has been co-financed by the European Social Fund and Junta de Castilla y Leon (Operational Programme 2014e2020 for Castilla y Le on, EDU/556/2019 BOCYL). s Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., … Zheng, X. (2015). {TensorFlow}: Large-Scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. arXiv preprint. Retrieved from https://www.tensorflow.org/.
  2. Heroku. (2020). Heroku | Cloud application platform. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from https://www.heroku.com/. IEEE Communications Society. (2018). IEEE Std 1934-2018: IEEE Standard for Adoption of OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Fig. 15 Water meter UI MiFincapp b i o s P1934/D2.
  3. O'Malley, T., Bursztein, E., Long, J., Chollet, F., Jin, H., & Invernizzi, L. (2019). Keras {Tuner}. Retrieved from https:// github.com/keras-team/keras-tuner. Open Fog Consortium. (2017). OpenFog reference architecture for Fog computing produced. Reference Architecture. https://doi.org/ OPFRA001.020817.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mateos Matilla, D., Lozano Murciego, Á., Jiménez-Bravo, D. M., Sales Mendes, A., & Leithardt, V. R. Q.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre (PT)
Venue
Biosystems Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
223
Pages
14-29
ISSN
1537-5110 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184280692
Cited by
43
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosystems Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación
  • Junta de Castilla y León
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Engineering and Agricultural Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Arduino and IoT Applications
Keywords
center pivot irrigation, irrigation monitoring, edge computing, low-cost equipment, user interface, LoRaWAN, Internet of Things, precision agriculture, digital divide, maize, wireless communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review