Cited by 139Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Biotechnological advances in mango (Mangifera indica L.) and their future implication in crop improvement—A review

Krishna, Hare, Singh, S.K.·2007·Biotechnology Advances

Abstract

Biotechnology can complement conventional breeding and expedite the mango improvement programmes. Studies involving in vitro culture and selection, micropropagation, embryo rescue, genetic transformation, marker-assisted characterization and DNA fingerprinting, etc. are underway at different centers worldwide. In vitro culture and somatic embryogenesis of several different genotypes have been achieved. The nucellus excised from immature fruitlets is the appropriate explant for induction of embryogenic cultures. High frequency somatic embryogenesis has been achieved in some genotypes; however, some abnormalities can occur during somatic embryo germination. Embryo rescue from young and dropped fruitlets can improve the hybridization success in a limited flowering season. Protocols for protoplast culture and regeneration have also been developed. In vitro selections for antibiotic tolerance and fungal toxin resistance have been very promising for germplasm screening. Genetic transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been reported. Genes that are involved with fruit ripening have been cloned and there have been attempts to deliver these genes into plants. DNA fingerprinting and studies on genetic diversity of mango cultivars and Mangifera species are also being conducted at several research stations. The purpose of this review is to focus upon contemporary information on biotechnological advances made in mango. It also describes some ways of overcoming the problems encou…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most used DNA markers are ISSR, RAPD, RFLP, SSR, AFLP, and SCoT.

    “The most used DNA markers are inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), microsatellites (SSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and start codon-targeted (SCoT) polymorphism [47,48,49,50,51].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishna, H., & Singh, S. K.
Affiliations
Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Krishna, Hare
Venue
Biotechnology Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
223-243
ISSN
0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093725232
Cited by
139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Advances (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
mango, crop improvement, somatic embryogenesis, embryo rescue, micropropagation, protoplast culture, genetic transformation, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, DNA fingerprinting, genetic diversity, in vitro selection, antibiotic tolerance, germplasm screening
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Transformation, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Crops, Agricultural, Mangifera, Tissue Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review